Archive for January, 2008

3-Minute Intro: Beauty and the Beast (La Belle et la Bête)

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

Screened: January 8, 2008
Format: DVD - Criterion (2003)
Selected By: Libby

Jean Cocteau was regarded as one of the leading French cultural figures of the early twentieth century when he created his 1946 fantasy Beauty and the Beast. Although he worked as a director, novelist, playwright, and designer, Cocteau considered himself first and foremost a poet, and a poetic sensibility runs throughout the output of his versatile career. A loose adaptation of an eighteenth century French fairy tale, Beauty and the Beast was Cocteau’s second film, and it shares the surrealism that characterizes much of his work. Far removed from the horrors of post-war Europe, yet infused with rich social and political commentary, Beauty challenged audiences to demand more from the fantasy genre. Cocteau was explicit about the film’s gender and sexual subtexts, and its deconstruction of traditional fairy tales motifs.

In Beauty, Cocteau utilizes baroque design and technical wizardry to create a phantasmagorical landscape where reality and fantasy mingle. The banality of the film’s opening sequences stand in stark contrast to the Beast’s castle, where Henri Alekan’s silvery photography reveals a new wonder or chill behind every corner. That Beauty and Beast was completed at all, let alone with such opulent production design and visual effects, is a minor miracle. The film suffered from post-war shortages of everything from film stock to textiles to medicine for Cocteau himself, who was seriously ill during the production. Under five hours of stifling makeup, French heartthrob Jean Marais conjures an amazingly affecting performance as the Beast. In his monstrous visage, Marais was widely regarded by French girls and women as much more appealing than when he appeared as the handsome prince. This subversive thematic twist is, of course, exactly what Cocteau intended.

Despite Beauty and Beast’s financial success in France and internationally, Cocteau wrote that his “greatest reward” was the enthusiastic response the film received at its first screening, held not for critics or the public, but for the film studio’s technicians. Six decades later, Beauty and Beast remains a milestone in early post-war French film, and in fantasy film generally. Its ambitious artistry has influenced filmmakers across genres, yet Cocteau’s sincere, challenging approach to his source material is still all too rarely emulated.

Review: Atonement

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

2007 (UK / France)
Director: Joe Wright
Viewed: January 7, 2008
Format: Theatrical Print

C - There’s a powerful film about the dimensions of morality somewhere beneath the surface of Atonement, but director Joe Wright doesn’t permit that film to fully emerge. Something tantalizing is going on in this adaptation of Ian McEwan’s novel, especially in the film’s first act, and thereafter whenever Romola Garai is on screen as the eighteen-year-old incarnation of the film’s primary narrator, Briony Tallis. Unfortunately, Wright and screenwriter Christopher Hampton seem content to coast on filmic conventions that, while attractively realized, seem misplaced or outright leaden. It’s challenging to discuss Atonement in detail without revealing its twist conclusion. Suffice to say that the daring metatextual themes of the source material seem to lose something in the translation to the screen.

Briony is thirteen years old at the film’s 1935 opening, set on her family’s beautiful estate in the Surrey Hills of England. Briony’s adult sister, Cecilia, and Robert Turner, a son in the household’s servant family, have recently returned from school at Cambridge. Briony’s cousins are staying at the mansion, and her adult brother Leon arrives with a business associate. The film’s first thirty to forty minutes take place during one sweltering summer day, as these characters gather at the Tallis estate and a tragedy unfolds. There is a repressed attraction between Cecilia and Robert, but also a tension born from the peculiar fissures of British class. Briony, who aspires to be a writer, sees and reads things on this fateful day that she doesn’t fully grasp. She makes some sensational assumptions, tainted with her own resentments and wishful thinking. Eventually, she accuses Robert of a brutal crime.

Atonement then fast-forwards four years. Robert, serving out a sentence in the Army, is separated from his unit in occupied France. Cecilia, estranged from her family, is waiting for his return in London. Briony is training to be a nurse, a penance for the accusation that has dealt Robert and Cecilia so much hardship. The events of that day years ago have continued to fester, their consequences reverberating across oceans and lives.

Atonement is strongest when it blazes directly into this ethical briar patch, and Wright’s skills as a storyteller shine during the first act. The film has a stagy quality in these scenes, but it is remarkably effective at conjuring an atmosphere of Old Testament family doom. Wrightâ’s direction is taught and ominous; we sense that something foul is unfolding long before anything unpleasant actually occurs on screen. The film’s sound design is memorable and relentless, suffusing parlors and gardens with Faustian menace. Wright replays scenes from different perspectives, and leaps between his characters to suggest their thoughts. It’s not an original approach, but it thrillingly serves the film’s interest in misunderstandings, intentions, and inhibitions. In short, Atonement adeptly addresses the essential thorniness of human relations. The events that occur at the Tallis estate might be implausible, but not distractingly so. The elements that swirl through the story–sex, gender, class, maturity, culpability, narcissism–are sufficiently intriguing that they produce a wicked, enticing brew.

And then… well, things just sort of meander off into the wilderness. Once the story leaps forward to the British retreat from France, Atonement abruptly turns into a turgid World War II drama. It’s not a bad film, mind you, but much less interesting than the film that preceded it. Cecilia and Robert pine for one another. Robert trudges across France. Briony tends to the incoming wounded. These sequences are shot and edited well, but they don’t offer anything original and their relationship to the film’s established themes is tenuous. There is a remarkable continuous shot, nearly five-minutes long, when Robert arrives at the beaches at Dunkirk. The camera pans and pans and just keeps on panning over a stunning tableau of British forces, calling to mind a Pieter Bruegel painting. From an aesthetic and technical perspective, it’s an achievement. What purpose it serves is less clear. Wright has apparently admitted that he was just showing off with this sequence. Why bother, then?

I’m not quite sure how to apportion the blame here. McEwan’s novel is widely regarded as a modern masterpiece, and Wright’s film is apparently a faithful adaptation. I suspect that Wright is too entranced with the epic sweep of history on display in the source material, and as a result neglected the slighter threads that cohere its scenes. Regardless, it’s frustrating to watch a bolder film slip right through Wright’s fingertips while he lingers mournfully over the devastation of the French countryside by the Nazis.

The final hour or so of Atonement is rescued primarily by Romola Garai, who gives a strong, tormented performance as Briony. Even when her scenes are aimless, Garai manages to find fascinating stripes in Briony, portraying her as earnest and penitent but a little touched. Keira Knightley and James McAvoy exhibit an urgent, torrid chemistry during the first act as Cecilia and Robert. Neither actor has the presence to lend the rest of film much gravity, however. McAvoy in particular seems to be literally wandering through his scenes, where he is granted only the thinnest and most humdrum characterization. Atonement flares to life a bit in the final confrontation between Briony, Cecelia, and Robert, but Wright has already painted himself into a corner by then.

Eventually, Vanessa Redgrave appears as an elderly Briony decades later, and there are jolting revelations. The floor drops out from under us, and fresh strata of meaning are revealed. Unfortunately, the twist feels more obligatory than earned. I have a strong sense that the conclusion is vastly more effective on the printed page.

Atonement begins as an insightful and sharply executed tragedy, only to lose its way in the mire of functional period drama banality. The lean and nasty first act and Garai’s engrossing performance just manage to redeem Wright’s extravagant missteps, making for a worthwhile, if frustrating, experience, and a glimpse at what might have been.

Film Diary: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Sunday, January 6th, 2008

2007
Director: David Yates
Viewed: January 5, 2008
Format: DVD - Warner Brothers (2007)

Film Diary: The Boss of It All (Direktøren for det Hele)

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

2006
Director: Lars von Trier
Viewed: January 5, 2008
Format: DVD - IFC (2007)

This film features Jens Albinus on a splendid 90-minute comedic jaunt as Kristoffer, and some scenes that are as hilariously excruciating as anything in The Office, such as when Albinus has to puzzle out exactly what his “character” asked a subordinate in an email. I’m not sure how to feel about von Trier’s experiment with “Automavision”. It seems to be an elaborate innovation in search of a problem, but who am I to deny an auteur his experiments?

Film Diary: Killer of Sheep

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

1977
Director: Charles Burnett
Viewed: January 5, 2008
Format: DVD - New Yorker Video / Milestone Cinematheque (2007)

Well, the hype is right. This was an excellent film, infused with an insightful naturalism I haven’t seen in American cinema in some time. I can’t recall a starker, more perfectly conveyed portrait of a thirty-something working class American male than Stan in Killer of Sheep. And Stan and his wife gently dancing to “This Bitter Earth” as she runs her hands over his bare torso? Easily the most sensual image in film this year.

The Best Films of 2007

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

Here we go. 2007 is officially over, and while we of course didn’t get to see all the films we wanted from this year, the Cinephiles have cobbled together their Best of 2007 lists. To qualify for these lists, a film must have been released in American theaters between January 1 and December 31, 2007. Only wide, limited, or select city releases qualify. Films released on the film festival circuit or in other nations only in 2007 do not qualify.

Participating Cinephiles submitted five unranked films selected as their favorites from 2007. Within each individual’s list, the films are presented in alphabetical order.

Andrew’s Top Five of 2007

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

Andrew Dominnik’s profound, majestic revisionist Western is one of those films that unexpectedly came together in all the right ways for me. The success of The Assassination lies in its innovative approach to the genre, daringly embraced and deftly executed. Dominnik reinvents the Western as a despairing, post-modern ballad, its breathtaking beauty lacerated with artifice and fatalistic, removed scrutiny. The result is a stimulating, marvelously effective work. Who would have thought that 160 lingering minutes of Brad Pitt and Casey Affleck swapping ominous dialogue would be the Western of the year? Full review here.

Death Proof

While Rodriguez gave us gleefully puerile thrills, Quentin Tarantino crafted his most mature film to date. More so that Jackie Brown or Kill Bill, Death Proof is a gloriously harrowing feminist fable. Sexual politics seen through a male funhouse prism, Death Proof is as socially conscious as any work from a mainstream director this year. Tarantino pulls off a spellbinding feat, blending wrenching suspense, hypnotic dialogue, and obsessive references, and then adding layers upon layers of provocative subtext. Death Proof is further confirmation that Tarantino is no slick, insincere appropriator, but a cunning commentator, a performance artist whose medium is all of film history.

No Country For Old Men

The debate over No Country rages, but I stand firmly in the camp that it is a new American classic. Joel and Ethan Coen have delivered a bold, mutinous contemporary Western that showcases their mastery of the medium. No Country wears the garb of a sharp, terrifying thriller, but this conceals something more ambitious. The moral terror of McCarthy’s novel—which I have since devoured—comes bubbling through like a force of nature. Surrounded by superb actors, Tommy Lee Jones is the harrowed center of No Country, delivering one of the most affecting performances of his career. Full review here.

Ratatouille

Brad Bird spins a high concept for the Food Network enthusiast—”He’s a rat, but he loves to cook!”—into endearing comedic gold. Ratatouille, Bird’s third and best feature, testifies to his remarkable hybrid talent, fusing dazzling visual design, madcap spectacle, and astute storytelling. Cunningly inverting the Disney formula (here an animal protagonist and human comic ensemble, Ratatouille’s sheer artistry hearkens back to the company’s earliest animation shorts and features, a superb accomplishment in itself. And yet it also hits the humane comedy sweet spot by uncovering the touching and the truthful in outrageous situations.

Zodiac

With Zodiac, David Fincher not only creates a stark, remorseless thriller—possibly the best of the past decade—but reveals a mature command in his direction. Zodiac is both an arduous, time-lapse portrait of obsession, and an unequivocal rejoinder to every trite, tidily resolved police procedural. It’s deliciously unconventional where it has every right not to be, and bristles with moments of dizzying terror. Mark Ruffalo as the shrewd, compelling Detective Toschi stands out amid several engrossing performances. Sweeping in scope but invested with clear-eyed focus, Zodiac delivers an unflinching rumination on mystery and violence in modern America.

Honorable Mentions: 12:08 East of Bucharest, Blame It on Fidel, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, God Grew Tired of Us, Into Great Silence, Juno, Once, Persepolis

Andrew’s Best Actors and Director of 2007

Best Performance by an Actor
Tommy Lee Jones - No Country For Old Men

There were several top-tier lead performances by male actors this year, but none of them has haunted me like Tommy Lee Jones in No Country For Old Men. Sheriff Ed Tom Bell is such a comfortable role for Jones that it’s tempting to dismiss his performance as natural typecasting and select a more revelatory turn (Casey Affleck in The Assassination of Jesse James) or a seductive low-key portrayal (Mark Ruffalo in Zodiac). Fundamentally, however, I come back to how Jones utilizes every speck of his formidable acting talent in each of Ed Tom’s gestures and words, and how the result is at once completely believable and profoundly moving. I actually tear up just remembering the way that Jones delivers his closing monologue. It’s a devastating performance from an American marvel.

Best Performance by an Actor (Runner-Up)
Mircea Andreescu - 12:08 East of Bucharest

12:08 East to Bucharest was an unexpected delight, a stunningly shot and wonderfully acted Romanian satire. Although the more textured political commentary likely sailed over my American head, nearly all the laugh-out-loud moments in this film can be laid at the feet of Mircea Andreescu, who gives a luminous comedic performance as the dour yet childlike Emanoil Piscoci. Andreescu channels influences as diverse as Charles Chaplin and Paul Reubens, and absolutely steals the show. It’s to his credit, then, that his presence is never distracting, but rather highlights the film’s wry observations on revolution, memory, and self-aggrandizement.

Best Performance by an Actress
Ashley Judd - Bug

Lately I’ve been thinking fondly of veteran Bollywood actor Tabu’s turn as Ashima Ganguli in The Namesake, if only because it is a pinnacle performance in a strangely underrated film. Given those criteria, however, then I absolutely have to go with Ashley Judd as Agnes White in Bug. I’ve never had much of an opinion on Judd’s acting chops, but her performance in William Friedkin’s paranoid-schizophrenia freefall is just incredible. It’s like watching a star coalesce from cosmic dust, swell into a burning orb, and collapse into a black hole, all in the space of two hours. It’s a career-high role, and I can’t honestly name a performance by a female actor this year that was more memorable.

Best Performance by an Actress (Runner-Up)
Kelly Macdonald - No Country For Old Men

Judd aside, if there was one female actor who stood head and shoulders above the rest this year, it was Kelly Macdonald as Carla Jean Moss in No Country For Old Men. Surrounded by mythic performances from male actors, Macdonald carves out her own deep fissure in the bleak landscape of No Country, never less that utterly convincing as Carla Jean. Watching Macdonald, it’s not just difficult to envision another actor in the role; it’s damn near incomprehensible. Who knew that a Scottish actress could so perfectly embody the weariness and quivering resolve within a slip of Texan trailer trash?

Best Director
David Fincher - Zodiac

It’s tempting to pick Joel and Ethan Coen, given that No Country For Old Men is such an achievement, or Brad Bird, given that he needs more recognition for his brilliant storytelling. Yet even ten months after the release of Zodiac, 2007 was the year of David Fincher. Fincher has made some mediocre films and some great films, but Zodiac is his first brilliant film. Its success lies not just in Fincher’s espresso-rich composition and legendary perfectionism, but in the plain fact that he takes what could have been a serviceable police procedural and elevates it into one of the finest American auteur films this year. Need proof that Fincher has emerged from the formidable, primal-scream shadows of Se7en and Fight Club? Witness how he conjures unbearable tension from nowhere during an interview in a breakroom, or how he makes the irrational fear of a dark basement so immediate and overpowering.

Libby’s Top Five of 2007

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly

This is a beautiful, touching film. Jean-Dominique Bauby’s story should be dreadfully depressing, Diving Bell presents it not as a handicapped man’s story, but simply as a man’s story. The movie is slow, but not boring. It was like a long hike in the woods. It may take some time, but every moment seems worthwhile. Julian Schnabel’s direction is reliant on imagery, but for a story about a man depending upon imagination to survive, it seems right. Mathieu Amalric’s performance made the movie for me. It is lovely and quiet, even when he is playing the playboy, pre-stroke Bauby.

Grindhouse

Deathproof is the superior film in my opinion. Critics were misguided when they regarded the dialogue as excessive. Tarantino is a dialogue master, and here he does not disappoint. The movie has an almost dangerous message about the power dynamics between women and men. Is it a healthy message? Not sure. Rodriguez’s Planet Terror is pure cliché in the best sense. The bad guys and good guys are clearly drawn and do what you expect them to do, and yet the film still seems fresh and exciting. Rose McGowan as Cherry Darling is a fun heroine: deadpan, snarly, and courageous.

Persepolis

This movie is an inspiration. Marjane Satrapi’s story is a fascinating one, not only due to the political struggles in Iran, but because she so beautifully intercuts those politics with her personal struggles. In Satrapi’s story, the struggles of the Iranian people seem just as significant as her struggles to discover love, independence, and her place in the Western world.

Ratatouille

I kept thinking about this cute little cartoon about rats that cook. Ratatouille was just… lovely. Brad Bird’s flair for animation is something I’ve loved since his early days with The Simpsons, so I knew it would be beautiful to watch. Here it is masterful. The artistry is astounding! The voice acting was superb, with Brad Garrett as Gusteau being my favorite performance. The humor was authentic without being juvenile, and the music was beautiful. This movie was just joyous to watch.

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street

Watching Johnny Depp sing a ballad about regret while slicing throats open to a deluge of candy-red blood was a singularly satisfying sight, and a great way to begin my Christmas holiday. It’s not just the Burton-Depp combo that makes this movie great, but it’s all the gory details. The muted palate brightened by blood, the searing look in Depp’s eyes throughout, Sascha Baron-Cohen’s snake Pirelli, and Helena Bonham-Carter’s chirpy-yet-dangerous Mrs. Lovett. There were moments that were hilarious, but so vile you wonder if you should laugh. I laughed, and frequently. Burton wins again.

Honorable Mentions: The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, Hot Fuzz, Knocked Up, No Country For Old Men, Waitress

Stephanie’s Top Five of 2007

300
Grindhouse
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street

Teresa’s Top Five of 2007

Black Snake Moan
Eastern Promises
I Am Legend
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street

Film Diary: Ratatouille

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

2007
Directors: Brad Bird and Jan Pinkava
Viewed: January 4, 2008
Format: DVD - Disney (2007)

3-Minute Intro: The Paleface

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

Screened: January 4, 2008
Format: DVD - Universal (2002)
Selected By: Stephanie

Until Mel Brooks took aim at the genre three decades later, Norman Z. McLeod’s 1948 Bob Hope vehicle The Paleface was the essential Western film parody. Created at the height of Hope’s prolific comedic film career at Paramount, The Paleface–along with his film noir parody, My Favorite Brunette—highlights the comedian’s ability to play the Vaudeville clown in any setting. Hope’s straight man here is a straight woman. The sultry Jane Russell, the pinup with the scornful gaze, succeeds as his foil by playing it aggressive and slightly amused, providing a counterpoint to Hope’s weak-kneed, reluctant gunslinger.

In Hope’s television specials and live performances, his trademark quips showcased the actor’s pitch-perfect comedic timing and captivating physical presence. Hope’s delivery had a self-effacing style, even when his jabs were pointed at others, earning him a reputation as a wry but unthreatening performer. In his films, the plot was more or less an excuse for Hope to offer ninety minutes of his characteristic sardonic commentary. “Painless” Potter, the un-hero of The Paleface, is but one incarnation of the archetypical Hope character from the Paramount years. No other comedic actors have been able to achieve the distinctive alchemy he brought to his protagonists: charismatic, cowardly, handsome, inept, sarcastic, painfully self-aware, earnestly pathetic, and ultimately someone you cheer for. Throughout his career, Hope modestly claimed his writers were the true comedic geniuses, but in The Paleface he ably demonstrates that ninety percent of humor is in the delivery.

Opposite the comedian is the sex symbol. In 1948, Jane Russell was known for her first role—and prominently featured cleavage—in the Howard Hughes Western The Outlaw. While her casting in the The Paleface was likely meant to tap into male audiences’ smoldering memories of her from that film, Russell used the opportunity to reveal her talents as a performer. Despite some salacious and dubious outfits, her Calamity Jane is the tough-as-nails outlaw hero of the film, and it is a testament to her talents that she conveys nerve and intellect along with her distinctive, daunting sensuality. Russell’s nascent comedic sensibilities are also obvious, and would achieve their pinnacle five years later when she arguably upstaged Marilyn Monroe in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes.

Review: The Savages

Friday, January 4th, 2008

2007
Director: Tamara Jenkins
Viewed: January 3, 2008
Format: Theatrical Print

C - The Savages is, if nothing else, unequivocal in its subject matter. It tackles the admittedly tricky topic of elderly dementia with gusto, exhibiting fearless interest in how such a tragedy can act as a catalyst and a stressor on toxic familial dynamics. The route it takes to this destination is muddled, however. Tamara Jenkins aspires for her second feature film to be both funny and touching, and to that end she traffics simultaneously in affected oddness, excruciating awkwardness, and legitimate human pain. The mixture never quite coagulates into anything particularly revelatory or even into lasting amusement. It’s a credit to Jenkins’ sharp dialog and the talent of her lead performers, therefore, that The Savages manages to find some absorbing drama in the deepest corners of the black comedy coal bin.

Laura Linney is Wendy Savage, a middle-age office temp and wannabe playwright. Linney has a somewhat inflexible approach to her acting, but she’s always mesmerizing to watch, and no less so in The Savages. Wendy is probably the most repulsive character she has ever played, and it’s a harsh spectacle to witness, given that age has bestowed me with a tendency for celebrity crushes on older, skillful actresses like Linney. Wendy lies compulsively, often to elicit envy or pity. She steals stacks of office supplies from work, sleeps with a married man, and self-consciously frets that her unproduced plays are too whiny and indulgent. She also clearly hates herself.

Philip Seymour Hoffman is Jon Savage, Wendy’s older brother and a professor of drama. Less repugnant but more pathetic than his sibling, Jon is trapped in author’s purgatory with an unfinished Bertolt Brecht book looming over him. Hoffman approaches the role with his now-familiar naturalistic style. As the rumpled Jon, he is full of mumbles, long sighs, and thousand-yard stares. He seems to have a significant intellect, but he’s so damn lethargic, any scruffy endearment he might have had has long been strangled. He can’t even work up the fortitude to marry his Polish girlfriend, despite the fact that her departure—due to an expiring visa—causes him obvious agony.

Given these middle-aged middle-class losers, wouldn’t you know there’s an unpleasant family history? Wendy and Jon rarely speak to each other, and they never speak to their father, Lenny, now living in Arizona with his ailing girlfriend. When the elder Savage begins descending into dementia, the brother and sister must retrieve him and find him a nursing home. Philip Bosco plays Lenny with alternating volcanic agitation and forlorn distraction, a believable performance that somehow maintains the focus on Wendy and Jon. And, indeed, The Savages is less about Lenny than about how his condition scratches his children’s scars until they are raw and bleeding.

Jenkins approaches the drama of these uncomfortable circumstances with admirably stifling realism. She doesn’t shy away from the sheer terrible fact of dementia, and she has a good sense for the wretched, absurd nature of its effects. I lost each of my grandfathers to Alzheimer’s disease and a Parkinson-plus syndrome, respectively, and The Savages‘ bleakness struck me as painfully authentic. In one of the film’s darkest, slickest moments, Hoffman launches into an arrogant, screaming monologue about the nursing home industry’s predatory aim to distract clients from the “horror-show” of aging with group activities and landscaping. Indeed.

Where The Savages falters is in its attempts to inject levity by means of deliberate eccentricity. This tactic is not inherently flawed. Juno, to offer a counterexample, employs slanted characterization and production design to great effect, blending them into an attractive and neatly executed comic whole. In contrast, Jenkins dribbles goofy details into The Savages without much consequence or sense. When Wendy and Jon arrive in Arizona to fetch their father, they inexplicably bring a gaudy, heart-shaped Mylar balloon. Nothing in Wendy or Jon’s character suggests this dash of kitsch. Its presence seems due to Jenkins’ desire to giggle at the indignity in husky, sulky Hoffman holding onto it. A similar dynamic plagues the broader narrative. When Lenny selects a racist silent film for movie night at his overwhelmingly black-staffed nursing home, the results are awkward, but also flimsy. The scene is unmoored from the rest of the film, and not particularly funny.

The Savages is at its wittiest when the ugliness of Lenny’s condition or Wendy and Jon’s personalities becomes so pronounced that the film ventures into farce. In other words, its funniest scenes are those that are the least deliberately funny. There’s a weird, visceral thrill in watching two gifted actors like Linney and Hoffman bicker, and some intriguing themes ooze through their characters’ neuroses. I don’t know that the film will hold up well on a second viewing, but Jenkins’ script is at its strongest in these moments, suggesting that a superior The Savages might lie in a two-person stage play.

There’s enough gleam in the best features of The Savages to recommend it, particularly if you like your comedy pitch-black. It’s an acidic pleasure to see Linney and Hoffman play characters like Wendy and Jon, and Jenkins is adept at crafting dialogue and subtly tugging her performers in the right directions. Unfortunately, she cobbles The Savages together without much discipline or significance, such that the result is ultimately aimless. That’s a shame. The Savages has an unsentimental view of aging and family that, unlike many comedies about damaged people and awful events, is both caustic and genuine.

Film Diary: Stranger Than Fiction

Friday, January 4th, 2008

2006
Director: Marc Forster
Viewed: January 3, 2008
Format: DVD - Sony Pictures (2007)