<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dirty Pretty Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/</link>
	<description>Appreciation and Criticism of Cinema Through Heartland Eyes</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, Alexander.  I appreciate your thoughtful, very detailed reviews, and it's a pleasure to see you over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, Alexander.  I appreciate your thoughtful, very detailed reviews, and it&#8217;s a pleasure to see you over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Coleman</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>Very well-written review, Andrew. I liked this more than you, but I will admit that it has some problems. And on the whole, I find myself remembering &lt;i&gt;Roman de Gare&lt;/i&gt; much more, and liking it, four and a half months after seeing it.

&lt;a href="http://colemancornerincinema.blogspot.com/2008/09/girl-cut-in-two-2008.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;My review of &lt;i&gt;A Girl Cut in Two&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well-written review, Andrew. I liked this more than you, but I will admit that it has some problems. And on the whole, I find myself remembering <i>Roman de Gare</i> much more, and liking it, four and a half months after seeing it.</p>
<p><a href="http://colemancornerincinema.blogspot.com/2008/09/girl-cut-in-two-2008.html" rel="nofollow">My review of <i>A Girl Cut in Two</i></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-2484</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Juliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/#comment-2484</guid>
		<description>Andrew, I remember that sequence in ROMAN DE GARE, and I agree it was dreamier.  I agree the Lelouch is flawed, but even though Chabrol is a far greater director in the larger scheme, I felt that partcular Lelouch was a bit batter than GIRL CUT IN TWO on balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, I remember that sequence in ROMAN DE GARE, and I agree it was dreamier.  I agree the Lelouch is flawed, but even though Chabrol is a far greater director in the larger scheme, I felt that partcular Lelouch was a bit batter than GIRL CUT IN TWO on balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-2483</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/#comment-2483</guid>
		<description>I'm glad you highlighted that opening sequence, Sam, because for me it was also an invigorating little gem in a middling film.  When I first saw those streaks of red light, I thought I was watching stylized spermatozoa!  There's something about the mystery of a first-person perspective in a moving car that lends itself to thrillers.  Lelouch's &lt;I&gt;Roman de Gare&lt;/I&gt; employed a similarly enticing car sequence, with a bit more dreamy flair.  Too bad the film, like &lt;I&gt;A Girl Cut in Two&lt;/I&gt;, was so flawed in other ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you highlighted that opening sequence, Sam, because for me it was also an invigorating little gem in a middling film.  When I first saw those streaks of red light, I thought I was watching stylized spermatozoa!  There&#8217;s something about the mystery of a first-person perspective in a moving car that lends itself to thrillers.  Lelouch&#8217;s <i>Roman de Gare</i> employed a similarly enticing car sequence, with a bit more dreamy flair.  Too bad the film, like <i>A Girl Cut in Two</i>, was so flawed in other ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-2481</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Juliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2008/10/14/dirty-pretty-thing/#comment-2481</guid>
		<description>I think you pretty much nail the conflicting feelings one has about this film, and one is tempted indeed to consign it to "guilty pleasure" status.
   It started off though with a bang, with that stunning red-filtered car window sequence which was boosted by one of opera's most sublimely beautiful arias, "In Questa Regia" from Puccini's TURANDOT.  I wasn't sure what to expect after that, but the film was intermittantly fascinating and tedious, a position that you basically evince in your altogether superlative critical discourse of this most challenging late film in the master of suspence's career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you pretty much nail the conflicting feelings one has about this film, and one is tempted indeed to consign it to &#8220;guilty pleasure&#8221; status.<br />
   It started off though with a bang, with that stunning red-filtered car window sequence which was boosted by one of opera&#8217;s most sublimely beautiful arias, &#8220;In Questa Regia&#8221; from Puccini&#8217;s TURANDOT.  I wasn&#8217;t sure what to expect after that, but the film was intermittantly fascinating and tedious, a position that you basically evince in your altogether superlative critical discourse of this most challenging late film in the master of suspence&#8217;s career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

