Archive for February, 2010

Film Diary: Wonderful Town

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

2007 (Thailand)
Director: Aditya Assarat
Viewed: February 23, 2010
Format: DVD – Kino (2009)

Revisiting this superb Thai romantic tragedy for the first time since I caught it at StLIFF in 2008, I was struck by how closely it hews to the rhythms and style of an American indie film.  There’s something about the relaxed but deliberate pace, the delicate soundtrack with the odd foray into pop sentiment, and the aura of small town menace that pushes into the film’s final sequences that lend it the tone of a Sundance feature (in the best possible way).  Yet it also possesses the unperturbed gaze and absorption with places—their sights, sounds, and, above all, textures—that have emerged as hallmarks of contemporary East Asian film.  Unlike many cinephiles, the appeal of Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s obscurantist works eludes me, so it’s refreshing to see director Assarat (in his feature film debut, no less) offer an alternative entry point into Thai cinema.  I appreciate the shattering third act U-turn in the narrative, and the themes of calamity and recovery that it underlines, but the primary joy I take from the film is how exquisitely it conveys its romantic elements.  When was the last time a film-maker so closely followed the process by which two lonely adults fall fitfully, hopelessly in love?  Assarat’s achievement rests on an uncluttered, engaging portrayal of how unexpected and irresistible the heart’s beckonings can be.

Experimental Treatment

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Shutter Island
2010 (USA)
Director: Martin Scorsese
Viewed: February 21, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (St. Louis Cinemas Moolah Theater)

Eternally the Catholic kid from the Garment District, Martin Scorsese has long used his narrative features to explore the relationship between violence and guilt.  Granted, the stultifying, deforming influence of societies on the individual frequently figures prominently into his films, with the societies in question ranging from blinkered, hierarchical subcultures to the vast, alienating melting pot of over-stimulated contemporary America.  Even Scorsese’s most unambitious feature in the past two decades, his 1991 remake of Cape Fear, took pains to develop the original film’s anemic foundations into a more substantive commentary on the absurdities of the criminal justice system and the allure of masculine mythology. However, cultural settings only seem to hold the director’s attention inasmuch as they relate to searingly personal concerns; at the center of most Scorsese films is a battered man squeezed between others’ rules and his own sins.  Given these tendencies, I suppose I should have expected that Shutter Island would prove to be something more elaborate and bruised than the “mere” creepshow thriller that is being presented in the film’s promotion.  Not that there’s anything wrong with a creepshow thriller done exceptionally well (q.v., Drag Me to Hell), but Scorsese, despite his profile, isn’t the film-maker that leaps to mind when one hears the phrase “Master of Horror.”  Shutter Island feels for all the world like a florid imitation of a Wes Craven delve, and it’s only in the final twenty minutes that the curtain is pulled back to reveal that Scorsese tell, the strand of private Christian torment that stretches all the way back to Mean Streets.

(more…)

Film Diary: Black Mama, White Mama

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

1973 (USA / Philippines)
Director: Eddie Romero
Viewed: February 19, 2010
Format: DVD - MGM (2001)

The hallmarks of a sexy, scuzzy Women-in-Prison feature–including a gratuitous shower scene complete with frolicking, and hard-assed lesbian guards in ridiculously short shorts–are pretty much dispensed with in the first fifteen minutes of Black Mama, White Mama. What remains is an exploitation The Defiant Ones, as Pam Grier and Margaret Makov (the former a working girl, the latter a freedom fighter of some sort) scurry from one ludicrous set piece to another. This is a straight-up Z-movie guilty pleasure, just the sort thing one can imagine a teenage Quentin Tarantino devouring. It’s a shame director Romero was so enamored with tedious gunfights, as it gives him less time to indulge in the loathsome weirdness that is the film’s real appeal. The torch-bearer of BMWM’s oddities is undoubtedly genre fixture Sig Haig, as a creepy, strangely high-spirited bounty hunter in a Jim Croce ’stache, whose choice of wardrobe and automobile are best described as “Roy Rogers on LSD.” That’s him above. Just take a moment to savor that shirt. Truth be told, I spent the better part of this film trying to puzzle out where the hell it’s supposed to take place. The vague “island” setting seems, at different times, to be somewhere in Hawaii, Cuba, Puerto Rico, or Vietnam. Between the Spanish-speaking Asian gangsters and the stray police uniform patch, I eventually tumbled to the fact that we are, indeed, in the Philippines. Such is the way of cheap, sleazy films bound for grindhouses the world over.

Film Diary: Black Caesar

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

1973 (USA)
Director: Larry Cohen
Viewed: February 19, 2010
Format: DVD - MGM (2001)

Perhaps the most valuable lesson to be learned from Black Caesar is this: Do Not Fuck With Fred Williamson. Not only can the man take a bullet in the gut and keep on coming for your traitorous ass, he will, as the above screenshot demonstrates, beat you within an inch of your life with a shoe-shine kit. I had been aware of ex-football star Williamson primarily from Italian dreck like Warrior of the Lost World and his campy performance in From Dusk Till Dawn. Little did I know that he had a significant career as a blaxploitation leading man, a career that this film kicked off. Intriguingly, many of Black Caesar’s elements crop up in Scarface, and especially in Goodfellas (including that aforementioned shine-box, which a corrupt cop uses to humiliate Williamson before it is turned on him as a weapon). Do you think that De Palma or Scorsese would ever cop to cribbing slightly from the fellow who directed Q, It’s Alive, and The Stuff? And by the by, that James Brown soundtrack? Pure gold.

Hurry Up and Wait

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

Police, Adjective (Politist, adj.)
2009 (Romania)
Director: Corneliu Porumboiu
Viewed: February 9, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Landmark Tivoli)

Corneliu Porumboiu’s willfully staid and yet wholly absorbing new feature, Police, Adjective, operates on two interlocking planes.  On the one hand, it is a police procedural of the driest sort imaginable, an agonizingly attentive study of how people, objects, and information travel through a drug investigation in a small Romanian city.   In this city, the Eastern Bloc bureaucracy (and furniture) is still firmly in place, as are draconian narcotics laws that the rest of the European Union has discarded.  Strictly as a lesson in how dull police work can be, and specifically how dully absurd it can be in a former Communist dictatorship, Police, Adjective is an intriguing work, whose stifling realism serves as a direct refutation to the bombast of the Cop Picture (regardless of nationality).  Porumboiu, however, is far too talented and unruly a director to simply engage in a bit of genre revisionism and call it a day.  Accordingly, there is another, more impressive level to the film, one absorbed with language and the way it shapes, steers, and constrains us.  What truly fascinates about Police, Adjective is how easily Porumboiu grafts what is for all practical purposes an academic treatise on linguistics onto his police procedural, and how the two complement and fortify one another.

(more…)

Bad Bad, Not Good Bad

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans
2009 (USA)
Director: Werner Herzog
Viewed: February 7, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Landmark Theaters Plaza Frontenac Cinema)

C - Full disclosure: I have never seen Abel Ferrara’s pitch-black 1992 character study, Bad Lieutenant. Neither has German film-maker and madman Werner Herzog. Unlike me, however, Herzog has directed a film titled The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans, so he perhaps needs a better excuse than my all-purpose cover for any patch of cinematic illiteracy, “It’s in my Netflix queue.” If the reports are to be believed, Herzog does not regard his new feature as a remake, reboot, re-imagining, or anything of the sort. He claims that he doesn’t even know who Ferrara is, and that the film’s producers dictated its title. All this makes me much more comfortable approaching tBL:PoC - NO (yeesh, it hurts to type that) as a standalone work, rather than a tribute to or riff on Ferrara’s film. Unfortunately, even if one regards Herzog’s film as a wholly original work, there’s no way around the fact that it is his sloppiest film in years, especially when compared to his last narrative feature, the lean, propulsive Rescue Dawn. Did I mention that the corrupt, degenerate, possibly psychotic police lieutenant of the title is played by American actor and madman Nicholas Cage? Letting Cage run loose in such a role might have been a nutty stroke of genius, but alas, Bad Lieutenant proves to be just another Bad Nick Cage performance, surrounded by a tonal and thematic muddle.

In a prologue set in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans detective Terence McDonagh (Cage) reluctantly saves a man from drowning in a flooded police station holding cell. He is promoted to lieutenant as a result, but he also severely injures his back, setting him up for a lifelong addiction to painkillers. Six months later, McDonagh is the lead officer on the murder of a Senegalese drug dealer and his family. Despite the police procedural window dressing, Bad Lieutenant is not, in any conventional sense, a crime drama. McDonagh deduces fairly quickly that the murderers are a local drug kingpin and his goons, and there are no unexpected twists in this murder mystery thread. Bad Lieutenant is truly about McDonagh himself, and about his downward spiral into an abyss of drugs, sex, gambling, corruption, violence, and madness. The murder case is but one aspect of his festering life that the viewer has the privilege of touring. McDonagh is addicted to prescription drugs and also to cocaine, but he isn’t averse to partaking in a little weed, heroin, or crack, as the situation warrants. He has a prostitute girlfriend, Frankie (Eva Mendes), who is also addicted to drugs and occasionally lets him shake down her customers. McDonagh has rung up a sizeable debt with his bookie (Brad Douriff) by betting (badly) on college football. He steals from the property room, and extorts drugs and sex from young club-goers by threatening them with arrest. His widower father (Tom Bower) is a drunk who has married another drunk (Jennifer Coolidge).

Herzog gives all of these elements more-or-less equal weight, signaling that the character of McDonagh is his focus, rather than the story per se. This isn’t to say that the narrative isn’t compelling in its way; it’s just that the film-makers are less concerned with what happens than how McDonagh reacts to those events, and we’re bound to follow their gaze. The film presents the lieutenant’s existence as an undifferentiated tangle of rotten situations, all of which are colliding. As with many addicts, there are no banal moments in McDonagh’s life: everything is always teetering on the edge of giddy victory or utter disaster. There is a kind of mesmerizing, frantic quality to the script, as one calamity leads to another and then another, and then the whole situation reverses with an unexpected stroke of luck, and then reverses again. At times, the story leans a bit too heavily on coincidence, but this arguably meshes with the film’s surrealist touches (more on those in a bit).

Herzog’s only clear objective seems to be to present a slice of this repulsive man’s life in sickening detail. There’s nothing intrinsically objectionable about this sort of character-based voyeurism, especially when the character in question is a compelling antihero (e.g., Taxi Driver, There Will Be Blood, or even…I don’t know… Aguirre: The Wrath of God). However, a film-maker working within this mode should at least take a stab at articulating the antihero’s understanding of themselves. Neither Herzog nor screenwriter William M. Finkelstein permit us to glance into McDonagh’s inner life. There are whispers of Catholic guilt, childhood nostalgia, unresolved racism and class envy, and other tidbits sprinkled here and there, but these elements have no functional relationship to the events we are watching. The lieutenant’s behavior is erratic, which is unrealistic–addicts don’t behave erratically, as their whole lives are tightly organized around getting high–and also prevents us from getting a handhold on what’s going on behind the sweaty, coke-addled histrionics. This being Herzog, there are some suggestions, in the dialog and through a recurring reptile motif, that McDonagh sees himself as an cold-blooded survivor, as single-minded as a predator on the prowl for its next meal. However, this cynical, amoral take on the character is not developed, and it frequently collides with other anemic themes. Elsewhere, Bad Lieutenant seems to be striving for a kind of ironic redemptive message, complete with a romantic embrace of the American Dream. Still elsewhere it is suggested that a prankster God is playing a direct role in manipulating events for His own sadistic amusement. Contradiction isn’t always a flaw, but here it just feels like the result of slipshod storytelling that possesses neither a clear conception of its protagonist nor a coherent thematic thrust.

If Herzog deserves much of the blame for this confusion, Cage’s distinctive brand of distracting silliness surely doesn’t help. To their credit, both actor and director don’t pull any punches; McDonagh is the center of the film, and boy do they want you to know it. Dressed in wrinkled, cream-colored suits a size too large, Cage slouches through the film with his chin slung low, looking like a cross between a sweaty southern lawyer and Frankenstein’s monster. He glowers, sneers, screeches, bellows, and laughs maniacally, delivering the sort of So-Bad-It’s-Good performances that is delicious fun to watch, but can’t really be called “acting” in the sense one normally would mean. I haven’t seen Cage in a film since he decided to dedicate himself to obvious rubbish like National Treasure and Ghost Rider, but the right feature can, on occasion, channel his broad, heedless style to great effect (e.g., Wild at Heart). Here the actor’s presence just serves to segregate his character from the rest of film, as though someone had spliced Cage’s cartoonish thrashings over a modulated, revealing performance by another actor. It’s entertaining as hell, sure, but it also torpedoes any chance that Bad Lieutenant might discover its thematic or emotional foundation within its central performance.

I am willing to entertain the notion that Bad Lieutenant is a farce, but if this is the case, then the film is an even more conspicuous failure than I am willing to believe. There are too many overtly grim moments, too many scenes suffused with vividly expressed grief and rage, for the film to read as a work of black humor. Granted, what humor the film possesses is decisively black in character, and Herzog is adept at both alleviating and amplifying the threat of violence with absurdity. However, the laughs that the film elicits are most frequently of the unintentional sort, usually courtesy of an outlandish line or gesture from Cage.

Herzog drizzles the film with surrealistic flourishes that provide a welcome jolt from McDonagh’s often suffocating descent into depravity, even if those flourishes often seem digressive. When McDonagh hallucinates that iguanas are crawling around a stakeout location, Herzog lingers indulgently on a lizard’s-eye view of the detectives. In what proves to be the film’s most inspired moment, McDonagh envisions the spirit of a slain gangster as a breakdancer spinning to zydeco music. “Shoot him again,” the lieutenant murmurs, “His soul is still dancing.” It’s exactly the sort of weirdness that the film needs. Unfortunately such moments are too far and few between for them to provide a convincing fabric of magical realism, and they just end up resembling isolated whimsical gestures.

Longtime Herzog cinematographer Peter Zeitlinger does a marvelous job of capturing a distinctive look for New Orleans and its environs, one that relies on neither a tourist’s rosy conception of the city nor a clichéd noir atmosphere. Zeitlinger’s approach seizes upon the city’s decay, but disregards the colonial or antebellum grandeur. Bad Lieutenant’s New Orleans is gray, wet, and rust-flecked. You can practically smell the mildew, the rotting fish, and the ripe body odor of relentless, humid summers. In one of the film’s finest shots, the camera crawls low over an asphalt highway, passes sputtering magnesium flares and skid marks, discovers a dead alligator with its entrails smeared, and then pans up to reveal a terrible multi-car auto accident. It’s a superb visual that just screams Louisiana, but Herzog and Zeitlinger manage to make it feel anything but gimmicky.

That sort of visual artistry makes it difficult to accept what seems obvious under an honest assessment: Bad Lieutenant is a Bad Movie. It’s never dull, and it’s often downright thrilling, but there’s just no getting around that it’s a complete mess in all the ways that matter, and right at the center is a slab of thespian excess that simply cannot be taken seriously. In the past few years, Herzog has made some of the best documentaries in the world, which is why it’s tempting to give a pass for something like Bad Lieutenant. However, the director proved just two years ago with Rescue Dawn that he can still create effective narrative features. Bad Lieutenant, by comparison, just feels careless and slightly embarrassing.

Play It Loud Enough to Keep the Demons at Bay

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

Crazy Heart
2009 (USA)
Director: Scott Cooper
Viewed: February 3, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (St. Louis Cinemas Moolah Theater)

When you strip Scott Cooper’s directorial debut, Crazy Heart, down to its skeleton, there’s not much that’s original about it from a story standpoint.  Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: a broken-down musician must come to terms with his personal demons before he can rise from the ashes and regain some of his former fame and fortune. Alas, Cooper doesn’t bring anything especially cinematic to these deeply rutted roads.  Sure, Crazy Heart was filmed on location in the American Southwest, and that lends it an agreeable sun-beaten texture, but Cooper’s direction is undistinguished.  Based purely on the look of the thing, Crazy Heart could pass for a television movie-of-the-week rather than a limited theatrical release boasting high-profile actors.  Fortunately, those actors are all in fine form, especially Jeff Bridges, who portrays the aforementioned broken-down musician, a grizzled country veteran named Bad Blake.  The glib cynic in me would like to believe that someone observed, “You know, put the Dude from The Big Lebowski in a cowboy hat and he could pass for the lost brother of Kris Kristofferson,” and then—bam!—there’s your movie.  Blessedly, Bridges’ performance amounts to much more than canny casting.  He and Cooper turn a familiar story, executed with rote efficiency, into something haunted and ultimately worth watching.

(more…)

Film Diary: Vanishing Point

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

1971 (USA / UK)
Director: Richard C. Sarafian
Viewed: January 31, 2009
Format: Netflix Instant Queue (via Playstation 3)

Vanishing Point definitely plays like a work from another era, in the worst and best sense.   The “Can’t Drive 55″ spirit that the film seizes upon–which it shares with the much zanier The Cannonball Run–unfortunately dates the film as an artifact from an era when a national speed limit was a hot political button.  That said, what’s most appealing about Vanishing Point is how eagerly and even joyously it strives to present a generous, oddball-ridden slice of early 1970s America.  The on-location shooting lends it a documentary look and texture, but the characters are so deliberately out-there, it never feels remotely like realism.  I mean, c’mon: the naked biker girl; the faith healers; the blind, black DJ in a shitheel desert town; the old rattlesnake catcher who turns up out of nowhere?  Delicious stuff, if you can stand it.  And for all the hurtling cars, this strangely-placed, slow-motion shot of a basket of snakes flying through the air is what most caught my eye.

I took a bit of a breather on the posting during January, but more reviews and other items will be coming soon.