<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experimental Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/</link>
	<description>Appreciation and Criticism of Cinema Through Heartland Eyes</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gateway Cinephiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Film Diary: Shutter Island</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-34775</link>
		<dc:creator>Gateway Cinephiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Film Diary: Shutter Island</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-34775</guid>
		<description>[...] [SPOILERS] Grading on a curve is a tricky and sometimes ill-advised endeavor, but now that I find myself at the halfway point in an apparently dismal year for cinema, Martin Scorseseâ€™s relentlessly moody labyrinth seems to merit a bit more affection than I afforded it back in February.Â  Granted, the flaws that were in evidence on a first viewing are still present: the dearth of gratifying horror rhythms; the relative aimlessness of the middle act; the fragility of Dr. Crawleyâ€™s outlandish scheme.Â  However, the whiff of disposability that emanates from any reliant on a concluding twist proves to be phantasmal here, for a second visit to Shutter Island provides bountiful avenues for engagement.Â  Foreknowledge of â€œTeddyâ€™sâ€ situation reveals a marvelously scrupulous aspect to the filmâ€™s assembly, especially vis-Ã -vis its performances.Â  One could dedicate a screening solely to observing Mark Ruffalo or Ben Kingsley, each of whom delivers a stunningly modulated portrayal that operates on two planes simultaneously.Â  Even the reaction shots from the bit players offer a peculiar kind of amusement, with each actor discovering their own way to convey, â€œI canâ€™t believe weâ€™re going along with thisâ€¦â€Â  In the end, however, the film succeeds on the strength of DiCaprioâ€™s throbbing performance, unquestionably his best in years, which arrives brimming with sweaty, anxious hostility and descends to place where oblivion seems a sweet release.Â  What might have been a garish carnival hoax is synthesized into searing portrait of a man hollowed-out by unsettled guilt and rage.Â  While the filmâ€™s ruminations on aggression are of a piece with Scorseseâ€™s absorption with â€œmen of violenceâ€ as Dr. Naehring describes Andrew, the film is far more compelling (and vigorous) when it is regarding memoryâ€™s double-edged sword.Â  In this, Andrew might share with Lost Highwayâ€™s Fred Madison a preference for â€œremembering things in his own way,â€ as opposed to confronting the horrors that he has witnessed and wrought.    Leave a Comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [SPOILERS] Grading on a curve is a tricky and sometimes ill-advised endeavor, but now that I find myself at the halfway point in an apparently dismal year for cinema, Martin Scorseseâ€™s relentlessly moody labyrinth seems to merit a bit more affection than I afforded it back in February.Â  Granted, the flaws that were in evidence on a first viewing are still present: the dearth of gratifying horror rhythms; the relative aimlessness of the middle act; the fragility of Dr. Crawleyâ€™s outlandish scheme.Â  However, the whiff of disposability that emanates from any reliant on a concluding twist proves to be phantasmal here, for a second visit to Shutter Island provides bountiful avenues for engagement.Â  Foreknowledge of â€œTeddyâ€™sâ€ situation reveals a marvelously scrupulous aspect to the filmâ€™s assembly, especially vis-Ã -vis its performances.Â  One could dedicate a screening solely to observing Mark Ruffalo or Ben Kingsley, each of whom delivers a stunningly modulated portrayal that operates on two planes simultaneously.Â  Even the reaction shots from the bit players offer a peculiar kind of amusement, with each actor discovering their own way to convey, â€œI canâ€™t believe weâ€™re going along with thisâ€¦â€Â  In the end, however, the film succeeds on the strength of DiCaprioâ€™s throbbing performance, unquestionably his best in years, which arrives brimming with sweaty, anxious hostility and descends to place where oblivion seems a sweet release.Â  What might have been a garish carnival hoax is synthesized into searing portrait of a man hollowed-out by unsettled guilt and rage.Â  While the filmâ€™s ruminations on aggression are of a piece with Scorseseâ€™s absorption with â€œmen of violenceâ€ as Dr. Naehring describes Andrew, the film is far more compelling (and vigorous) when it is regarding memoryâ€™s double-edged sword.Â  In this, Andrew might share with Lost Highwayâ€™s Fred Madison a preference for â€œremembering things in his own way,â€ as opposed to confronting the horrors that he has witnessed and wrought.    Leave a Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shutter Island &#124; Calculated Crunch News Links</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-29331</link>
		<dc:creator>Shutter Island &#124; Calculated Crunch News Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-29331</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew from Gateway Cinephiles says: &#8220;Shutter Island feels for all the world like a florid imitation of a Wes Craven delve, and it&#8217;s only in the final twenty minutes that the curtain is pulled back to reveal that Scorsese tell, the strand of private Christian torment that stretches all the way back to Mean Streets.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrew from Gateway Cinephiles says: &#8220;Shutter Island feels for all the world like a florid imitation of a Wes Craven delve, and it&#8217;s only in the final twenty minutes that the curtain is pulled back to reveal that Scorsese tell, the strand of private Christian torment that stretches all the way back to Mean Streets.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-28043</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-28043</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, Castor, and thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, Castor, and thanks for stopping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Castor</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-28001</link>
		<dc:creator>Castor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-28001</guid>
		<description>Excellent review! I absolutely loved the movie even though it does sag intermittently thanks to the outstanding performances from a very deep cast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent review! I absolutely loved the movie even though it does sag intermittently thanks to the outstanding performances from a very deep cast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

