<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s a Strange World: The Alphabet (1968)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/</link>
	<description>Appreciation and Criticism of Cinema Through Heartland Eyes</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monday Morning Diary (April 12) &#171; Wonders in the Dark</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-30327</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Morning Diary (April 12) &#171; Wonders in the Dark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 03:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/#comment-30327</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew Wyatt has really been writing one masterpiece after another at his Gateway Cinephiles home, and the latest is on an essential David Lynch short &#8220;The Alphabet&#8221; (1968).Â  It&#8217;s an essential piece: http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrew Wyatt has really been writing one masterpiece after another at his Gateway Cinephiles home, and the latest is on an essential David Lynch short &#8220;The Alphabet&#8221; (1968).Â  It&#8217;s an essential piece: <a href="http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/" rel="nofollow">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-30019</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/#comment-30019</guid>
		<description>Sam:

The "Short Films of David Lynch" DVD contains this and other early shorts by the director, but you can also watch "The Alphabet" on YouTube right now:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmMwKBMse_w

Thanks for your compliments.  It's kind of a cool coincidence that you started posting James' series on Lynch around the same time that I began this retrospective, which I've been planning for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam:</p>
<p>The &#8220;Short Films of David Lynch&#8221; DVD contains this and other early shorts by the director, but you can also watch &#8220;The Alphabet&#8221; on YouTube right now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmMwKBMse_w" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmMwKBMse_w</a></p>
<p>Thanks for your compliments.  It&#8217;s kind of a cool coincidence that you started posting James&#8217; series on Lynch around the same time that I began this retrospective, which I&#8217;ve been planning for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-29985</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Juliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/04/06/its-a-strange-world-the-alphabet-1968/#comment-29985</guid>
		<description>"With a richly symbolic, viscerally disturbing four-minute pseudo-narrative, Lynch presents an adultâ€™s vision of a childâ€™s striking, abstract fears.  Education, in the form of the twenty-six letters of the alphabet, becomes a psychic violation."

 "Within The Alphabetâ€™s sinister, poetic confines, education takes on the air of a breach or infection.  The childâ€™s mind, which exists in a pre-language state of openness, is restrained and subjected, Ludovico-style, to a repeating sequence of runic symbols, which authorities insist must form the basis for her future thoughts.  The individual who was once receptive of non-verbal inspiration becomes rigidly bound to a discrete set of formulae.  The process of internalizing the alphabetic figures thus becomes a kind of mental foot-binding, a deformation of the childâ€™s natural state in order to fulfill the cultural requirements of adults"

Sadly Andrew, I come here to this spectacular review without having seen this film.  But your brilliant peeling of the gauze really brings this under the closest scrutiny imaginable, and I dare say you really whet one's appetite.  You've really been on a Lynch binge as of late contributing master class comments under other reviews, and writing incomparable essays like this one.  I was particularly interested in you dissection of the use of sound here, as well as the various elements that make the film out and out horror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With a richly symbolic, viscerally disturbing four-minute pseudo-narrative, Lynch presents an adultâ€™s vision of a childâ€™s striking, abstract fears.  Education, in the form of the twenty-six letters of the alphabet, becomes a psychic violation.&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8220;Within The Alphabetâ€™s sinister, poetic confines, education takes on the air of a breach or infection.  The childâ€™s mind, which exists in a pre-language state of openness, is restrained and subjected, Ludovico-style, to a repeating sequence of runic symbols, which authorities insist must form the basis for her future thoughts.  The individual who was once receptive of non-verbal inspiration becomes rigidly bound to a discrete set of formulae.  The process of internalizing the alphabetic figures thus becomes a kind of mental foot-binding, a deformation of the childâ€™s natural state in order to fulfill the cultural requirements of adults&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly Andrew, I come here to this spectacular review without having seen this film.  But your brilliant peeling of the gauze really brings this under the closest scrutiny imaginable, and I dare say you really whet one&#8217;s appetite.  You&#8217;ve really been on a Lynch binge as of late contributing master class comments under other reviews, and writing incomparable essays like this one.  I was particularly interested in you dissection of the use of sound here, as well as the various elements that make the film out and out horror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

