Archive for May, 2010

Film Diary: Bad Timing

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

1980 (UK)
Director: Nicolas Roeg
Viewed: May 25, 2010
Format: Digital Projection (Webster University Moore Auditorium)


(Screen capture from DVD Beaver.)

[Bad Timing was screened on May 25, 2010 as a part of the Webster University Film Series' retrospective on the early films of Nicolas Roeg.]

[SPOILERS] If you have ever harbored a nagging suspicion that there’s something a tad creepy about Art Garfunkel, then Bad Timing serves as a resounding confirmation of those qualms. If, however, your conception of the soft-spoken folk musician is bookishly benign, then his presence in Nicolas Roeg’s curious film is likely to deliver an uncanny jolt, particularly when Garfunkel’s character, psychology professor and profiler Alex Linden, is revealed to be a twisted obsessive and rapist. The most fascinating aspect of Bad Timing is how skillfully Roeg–working from a script by Yale Udoff–essentially achieves a noir bank shot off Garfunkel’s public persona, and more generally off of his audience’s assumptions vs-à-vis relationships and gender. For roughly the first half of the film, the story seems to be about a meek academic who is used and abused by Milena (Theresa Russell, all thighs and eyes), a self-absorbed party girl and compulsive liar. Then the emotional contours of the tale begin to subtly shift. The jarring, seemingly arbitrary flashbacks that Roeg sprinkles throughout the film start to accumulate into a more truthful picture of Alex and Milena’s rotten relationship, and–presto!–the story is actually about a damaged woman who is controlled, stalked, and ultimately assaulted by a sociopath. It’s a fake-out, but not an especially galling one. Roeg’s disjointed storytelling technique is preoccupied with concealing not the mystery surrounding Milena’s drug overdose, but the inevitably violent clash between her negligent personality and Alex’s disturbed need to control and possess her. It’s not clear there was ever love there, so let’s call it a tale of lust gone sour, amplified by Roeg’s relentless cutting and peculiar (at times even silly) scoring choices. While it can’t hold a candle to Don’t Look Now in terms of atmospherics or emotional vigor, it’s still nasty, daring stuff.

Film Diary: Walkabout

Monday, May 24th, 2010

1971 (UK)
Director: Nicolas Roeg
Viewed: May 22, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Webster University Moore Auditorium)

[Walkabout was screened on May 22, 2010 as a part of the Webster University Film Series’ retrospective on the early films of Nicolas Roeg.]

The most remarkable thing about Roeg’s directorial debut—other than the fact that such an unabashedly poetic and self-assured work could be anyone’s directorial debut—is the density of the thing.  This is a film that is richly layered with meaning, and yet Roeg achieves such thematic bulk while hewing to an approach that is fairly realistic.  Sure, there are heavy-handed cross-cuts, and much gooey lingering on ripe orange sunsets, and narrative digressions that range from the obscure to the weirdly comic.  However, there’s not much in the film that one could categorize as surrealistic or avant-garde, at least in the mode of Jodorowsky or Lynch (or, for that matter, later Roeg).  It’s fascinating, then, that there is such ample room for disagreement on what Walkabout is, well, about.  There’s some embracing and critiquing of cultural myths in there: the ignorant savage, the noble savage, the wilderness as utopia, the wilderness as wasteland.  There are obvious themes of colonialism, civilization, and, yes, communication.  What resonates strongest for me is the allegory of a sexual awakening (and the fear and confusion it engenders), but this is but one fragment of what makes the film such a compelling experience.  Certainly, the closing scenes add a heaping dose of wistfulness, a bittersweet eulogy for those times and places to which we cannot return and are almost certainly idealized in our minds.  The thematic correspondence between Roeg’s film and Terence Davies’ exquisite Of Time and the City is only underlined by their shared quotation (at the end and beginning, respectively) of A.E. Housman’s A Shropshire Lad:

Into my heart an air that kills
From yon far country blows:
What are those blue remembered hills,
What spires, what farms are those?

That is the land of lost content,
I see it shining plain,
The happy highways where I went
And cannot come again.

Little House on the Shoulder

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Home
2008 (Switzerland / France / Belgium)
Director: Ursula Meier
Viewed: May 19, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Webster University Moore Auditorium)

[Home was featured in a limited engagement on May 14-19, 2010 at the Webster University Film Series.]

Suffused with both balmy affection and a mounting aura of calamity, Ursula Meier’s Home presents an unnerving portrait of a family floundering on the shoals of modernity.  The director has described her film as a “road movie in reverse,” and that seems as apt a description as any.  While the archetypal road movie entails a journey outward to discover something of value, Home concerns itself with a family that has already found everything it needs, only to have its idyllic state disturbed, fractured, and ultimately pulverized by the movements of others.  The film’s clan—never graced with a surname—dwells in a modest house in the countryside, where an old, unfinished highway runs right through their front yard and has been re-purposed as the family’s personal parking lot and street hockey rink.  One night, asphalt trucks rumble down the road, and steel barriers spring up along the shoulder and the median.  The metaphor is stark: the highway’s abrupt completion sends cracks through the family’s contented existence, disrupting their physical environment, their well-worn routines, and their interpersonal dynamics.  However, Meier steers clear of tussles with central planning bureaucrats, or other Kafkaesque ordeals.  Instead, she vividly explores the results of the family’s perhaps blinkered determination to stick it out and carry on with their lives.  And therein she discovers compelling insights into the fragile nature of domestic happiness and the anxious, bewildering character of contemporary life.

(more…)

Metal on Metal

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Iron Man 2
2010 (USA)
Director: John Favreau
Viewed: May 16, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Hi-Pointe Theater)

If one regards it primarily as the second chapter in a presumable trilogy of films about billionaire industrialist Tony Stark’s super-weapon persona, Iron Man 2 is a slick slice of cinematic entertainment.  Director Jon Favreau and leading man Robert Downey, Jr. deliver heaping helpings of the essential vibrancy and wit that rendered the first entry in Marvel’s technophilic franchise such a giddy revelation.  However, while it functions well enough as a sequel, or as a mere episode in a broader saga, Iron Man 2 is bit soggy when approached on its own merits.  Favreau and scripter Justin Theroux—the actor/writer who penned the deliciously acidic Tropic Thunder—are aiming for too many targets in some scenes, while in others they seem to be spinning their wheels in anticipation of the next action set-piece.  Accordingly, the film has trouble conveying the sense of nitro-fueled urgency necessary for the Iron Man myth, which is at bottom a Popular Science wet dream with a dash of guilt and ambivalence.  The sequel just doesn’t hum along so effortlessly as its predecessor, which in retrospect, seems much leaner and more focused, as origin stories often are.  Favreau gives us a middle chapter that is preoccupied with mortality, legacies, and thinly veiled allegories about geopolitical blowback and loose nukes. These elements are tackled with aplomb, but cobbled together in such a manner that Iron Man 2 feels a bit haphazard.  Eh, no matter.  We’re all just here for Downey’s quips, right?

(more…)

Just For One Day

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Kick-Ass
2010 (USA / UK)
Director: Matthew Vaughn
Viewed: May 11, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (AMC Esquire)

The high concept that undergirds Kick-Ass, while hardly a model of sparkling originality, at least holds the potential for a witty character piece or an intriguing flexing of generic norms.  Colorless, clueless high school student and comic aficionado Dave Lizewski (Aaron Johnson) poses what he believes to be a fair question to his fellow geeks: Why has no one ever tried to be a real super hero?  The answers seem obvious to Dave’s pals.  Super-powers don’t actually, you know, exist, and even “regular guys” like Bruce Wayne are billionaires with access to science-fiction technology. Any real masked vigilante would end up in traction fairly quickly.  Dave will not be deterred, however.  Kick-Ass presents itself as a miserablist “What-If?” scenario about a scrawny kid donning a green wetsuit and attempting to fight crime.  Unfortunately, the film lacks focus: at times it prefers the mode of a violent comic book played straight, or a limp high school farce, or a deadpan send-up of the superhero genre.  Director Matthew Vaughn simply has no notion of where he wants to take this adaptation of Mark Millar and John Romita, Jr.’s comic, and the film’s sporadic moments of droll inventiveness don’t redeem its awkward muddling of its pedestrian components.

(more…)

Film Diary: Ponyo (Gake no ue no Ponyo)

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

2008 (Japan)
Director: Hayao Miyazaki
Viewed: May 9, 2010
Format: Blu-ray – Disney (2010)

While it possesses neither the unexpected gentleness of My Neighbor Totoro, nor the apprehensive grandeur of Spirited Away, Ponyo surely deserves a position close behind those Miyazaki masterpieces, even if it never attains such perfection itself.  Certainly, there are stray elements in this alternately grounded and oneiric fable that never quite fit together comfortably, and the conclusion feels unaccountably limp and vague after all the fretting about a “world out of balance” provoked by our titular fish-girl’s giddy escape.  On the other hand, Miyazaki’s tendency to elide crucial details about his fantasy cosmologies seems far less of a stumbling block here than in his other works, if only because Ponyo privileges unadulterated joy and the subtleties of the parent-child relationship over world-building.  Together, Miyazaki’s film and Henry Selick’s Coraline gave us more thoughtful ruminations on growing up than the rest of the decade’s kiddie fare combined.  On a second viewing, what’s striking about Ponyo from a visual standpoint is the spectrum of drawing styles.  Consider the shots above; would you assume that they came from the same film, if it weren’t for that conspicuous shock of orange hair?  Given how closely Miyazaki himself supposedly labored on the animation, it’s hard not to conclude that this diversity is intentional.  The cruder, almost doodle-like style seems to predominate when Ponyo is caught in the protean state between goldfish and little girl.  The visual approach to Sosuke and a now-human Ponyo at play, meanwhile, invites comparisons to Charles Schultz’s precocious tykes, albeit given roundness of form and a richly realized environment as only Miyazaki can.

Film Diary: Children of Men

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

2006 (Japan / UK / USA)
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Viewed: May 7, 2010
Format: Blu-ray - Universal (2009)

This was my first occasion to revisit Cuarón’s despairing-then-hopeful thrill ride since its fumbled theatrical release and more recent best-of-the-decade accolades (the film appeared at #76 in Slant’s countdown and claimed Reverse Shot’s #19 slot).  In retrospect, it’s clear why Children of Men—and not the hot-and-bothered arthouse amble Y tu mamá también, or the auteurist blockbuster Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban—is the feature that secured the director’s status as the most disciplined and effortlessly engaging of Mexico’s big-name film-makers. Four years later, it’s not Children’s dense science-fiction world-building that most impresses, nor the technical bravado of those one-take action set pieces (especially given that the visceral, immersive impact of a first-time viewing can never be recreated).  No, what’s astonishing is the simplicity of the thing, despite the stable of screenwriters and the mammoth, textured character of Cuarón’s near-future landscape.  Compared to the other science-fiction achievements of the past decade, Children of Men is a tightly plotted thing, lacking any of the extraneous elements that so often bog down other entries in the genre.  While it may be less thematically ambitious than either WALL•E or Moon, Cuarón film doesn’t seem to have a single narrative fumble or pinch of flab.  Everything serves its propulsive, harrowing observation of Theo’s journey from apathy to heroism, an evolution that Cuarón and leading man Clive Owen make all the more potent by rendering it with perfect naturalism.  If Children of Men’s Abu Ghraib imagery now seems stale, consider that Arizona’s recent enactment of a “Papers, Please” law lends the film’s police-state treatment of illegal immigrants—excuse me, “fugees”—a new-found weight.  It just goes to prove that a pitch-perfect dystopian fable never loses its relevance.

Quick Review: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (Män som hatar kvinnor)

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

2009 (Sweden)
Director: Niels Arden Oplev
Viewed: May 1, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Landmark Plaza Frontenac)

The film adaptation of the late Stieg Larsson’s phenomenally popular novel, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, is a nearly flawless Swedish replica of a lurid Hollywood thriller.  Whether that statement represents high praise or a backhand compliment depends on one’s regard for lurid Hollywood thrillers, but director Niels Arden Oplev has created, at minimum, a fierce little whodunit that is unwavering in its crackling regard for its heroine.  That would be Lisbeth Salander, a misfit hacker with anemic social skills and an eidetic memory, embodied with spooky precision by Noomi Rapace.  Oddly alluring and as tightly wound as a feral cat, Rapace is far more compelling than Michael Nyqvist’s doughy journalist or the film’s convoluted story of a vanished teen.  Oplev, to his credit, preserves the novel’s righteous anger at misogynistic violence, and also its flair for lending thrilling significance to the tiniest of clues.  However, the film’s gloomy aesthetic and faux-provocative shocks don’t conceal its fundamentally disposable nature.  Salander may add some texture to the ranks of fictional female sleuths, but Girl is still just crime, peril, and conspiracy recast as entertainment, a movie-of-the-week seen through a Scandinavian, post-Thomas Harris lens.