Comments on: What’s It Like to Be the Bad Man? http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/07/16/whats-it-like-to-be-the-bad-man/ Appreciation and Criticism of Cinema Through Heartland Eyes Tue, 22 May 2012 06:07:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Charles Chaplin, Anthony Mann, ‘Inception,’ and ‘Kisses’ on Monday Morning Diary (July 19) « Wonders in the Dark http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/07/16/whats-it-like-to-be-the-bad-man/comment-page-1/#comment-37099 Charles Chaplin, Anthony Mann, ‘Inception,’ and ‘Kisses’ on Monday Morning Diary (July 19) « Wonders in the Dark Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:04:03 +0000 http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/07/16/whats-it-like-to-be-the-bad-man/#comment-37099 [...] Andrew Wyatt admits there are “structural flaws” present in Michael Winterbottom’s The Killer Inside Me, but he finds it nonetheless “fascinating” in an excellent capsule consideration of “Gateway Cinephiles”: http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/07/16/whats-it-like-to-be-the-bad-man/ [...] [...] Andrew Wyatt admits there are “structural flaws” present in Michael Winterbottom’s The Killer Inside Me, but he finds it nonetheless “fascinating” in an excellent capsule consideration of “Gateway Cinephiles”: http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/07/16/whats-it-like-to-be-the-bad-man/ [...]

]]> By: Sam Juliano http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/07/16/whats-it-like-to-be-the-bad-man/comment-page-1/#comment-37084 Sam Juliano Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:21:00 +0000 http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/07/16/whats-it-like-to-be-the-bad-man/#comment-37084 The age old argument of what some see as violent exloitation vs. art is yet again on this play in this nasty film, which is certainly 'beauty in the eye of the beholder' all over again. You have framed the parameters quite well in this typically fecund piece, which brings to mind the placement of another film within this sub-genre, IRREVERSIBLE, reviewed recently and placed prominently on the 2000's poll at WitD. The age old argument of what some see as violent exloitation vs. art is yet again on this play in this nasty film, which is certainly ‘beauty in the eye of the beholder’ all over again. You have framed the parameters quite well in this typically fecund piece, which brings to mind the placement of another film within this sub-genre, IRREVERSIBLE, reviewed recently and placed prominently on the 2000’s poll at WitD.

]]>