Archive for September, 2010

Quick Review: The Town

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

2010 (USA)
Director: Ben Affleck
Viewed: September 29, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Hi-Pointe Theater)

B- - Compared to the narrative eccentricity and mournful pose of his striking directorial debut, Gone Baby Gone, Ben Affleck’s sophomore effort adheres strictly to cops-and-robbers boilerplate, albeit with generous sprinklings of “Bah-stahn” Irish grit. Less arresting and ambitious than its predecessor, The Town spins a cheerless and familiar tale: a golden-hearted bank robber is beset with a loose cannon partner who stymies his efforts to go straight. In this case, the roles are filled by Affleck as a tender, teetotaling lunk and Jeremy Renner as his live-wire, bloody-minded childhood friend. Naturally, there’s also a crusading FBI agent (John Hamm) and a gorgeously blank love interest (Rebecca Hall) on hand. The snag is that Affleck’s romantic pursuit of the latter occurs after her stint as his blindfolded hostage. The schematic character of the story doesn’t seem to register for Affleck, but he nonetheless keeps the class and cultural lines therein gratifyingly stark. The Town grinds down the Beantown romanticism of the director’s past projects, with the marvelously unstudied production design conveying an unflattering urban grubbiness without resorting to the grotesque. The look of the thing—and Affleck’s facility for tense getaway sequences—are enough to render The Town a worthwhile macho melodrama.

Look/Listen: A Tender Soul in a Rigid World

Monday, September 27th, 2010

My new piece at Look/Listen posted while I was away on vacation. Given that it was timed to coincide with the Stella Artois French Film Festival on September 17-19, I suppose it’s a little belated to draw your attention to it now. Still, if you want to read my thoughts on the sublime offerings from Jacques Tati that screened at the festival–M. Hulot’s Holiday and Play Timecheck them out here.

On Holiday

Friday, September 10th, 2010

I’ll be on vacation from Saturday, September 11 through Sunday, September 26.  Hopefully, things will go better for me than they did for Peter Hunter when he ventured into the abyss of the West Yorkshire Constabulary.  Posting will resume shortly after I return. My latest piece at Look / Listen should be up next weekend.  Look for it here.

Vaya Con El Diablo

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

Machete
2010 (USA)
Directors: Robert Rodriguez and Ethan Maniquis
Viewed: September 6, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (St. Louis Cinemas Moolah Theater)

B- - Among the fake trailers that played in the theatrical version of the Robert Rodriguez / Quentin Tarantino joint Grindhouse, the grainy, tobacco-yellow glimpse of the Mexploitation bloodbath Machete was distinguished by how little it left to the imagination. Directed by Rodriguez himself, the trailer essentially gave us the entire plot of the film: day laborer and former federale Machete (Danny Trejo) is hired as an assassin by an American politician, is subsequently double-crossed, and then proceeds to extract a grisly revenge with his titular weapon of choice. The trailer was punchy and funny, especially the tagline (”They just fucked with the wrong Mexican!”), but it didn’t exactly demand to be expanded into a feature-length film. Nonetheless, Rodriguez has done exactly that, heedless that the endeavor undermines the wry cleverness of the whole fake trailer premise. Co-directed by Ethan Maniquis, a veteran of the editing shop at Rodriguez’ Troublemaker Studios, Machete necessarily loses some of its jagged pithiness when expanded to 105 minutes. Moreover, there’s no getting around the fact that the film is howlingly silly in a manner not seen in any non-Spy Kids Rodriguez venture since From Dusk Till Dawn. Unlike that film, however, Machete is unswerving in its tone: balls-out cheesiness with a slathering of Latino Pride. What sets it apart from slightly more vacuous guilty pleasures (e.g. The Losers) is its languid self-awareness, its cheeky attention to detail, and its crude but timely political consciousness. It also has Michelle Rodriguez in a beret, eye-patch, and bikini top, wielding a big fucking gun. Need I say more?

It’s hardly worthwhile to recount the details of the plot, given that Rodriguez characteristically disregards narrative cohesiveness, preferring to giddily string together schlocky set pieces like combo punches in a fighting game. Suffice to say that Machete finds himself targeted by a vast conspiracy encompassing a reactionary Texas state senator (Robert De Niro), his wealthy PR svengali (Jeff Fahey), a border-patrolling vigilante (Don Johnson), and the Mexican drug lord (Steven Seagal) that just happens to have slaughtered our hero’s family. In Machete’s corner are his shotgun-toting priest brother (Cheech Marin), an idealistic ICE agent (Jessica Alba), and the aforementioned Michelle Rodriguez as a taco truck entrepreneur waging a secret guerilla war for illegal immigrants’ rights. It’s Rodriguez’ revolutionary—archly referred to in Guevara-inspired iconography as “She”—who rallies a network of immigrant workers to Machete’s side from Texas hotel rooms, restaurant kitchens, and garden tool sheds.

Rodriguez’ persistent limitations as a filmmaker are unfortunately evident in Machete. The film harbors the customary groan-worthy dialog and disharmonious, slapdash storytelling that has been the director’s stock and trade for some time. The latter is all the more apparent here, as Machete bears the often harsh seams of a film written around the scenes and one-liners established in the original trailer. Nonetheless, Rodriguez remains inimitable in his ability to strike a frantic pose directly on the thin line between the satirical and the legitimately ludicrous. Machete is clearly a winking enterprise overall, but how exactly are we to take the sight of Lindsay Lohan as a revolver-packing nun, sneering out the line, “In the name of the Father—I forget the rest”? Is it intended to invite a snort of disbelief or a guffaw of guilty delight? Perhaps both?

Cheese though it might be, Machete is an unabashedly populist film, in the rough manner of the exploitation films of yore. Its politics are hardly sophisticated stuff, manifesting primarily as fist-pumping affection for the Latino underdog in the face of racist cracker bogeymen. Rodriguez makes his villains easy to hate, his heroes easy to like, and puts all the lusciously hot women in the latter category. It would be crass as hell if it weren’t so lip-smackingly mindful of its crassness, or so pointedly unconcerned with gravitas. Simply put, the film doesn’t contain a jot of sobriety. Even a dreadful speech from Alba that shamelessly riffs on Malcolm X is played primarily for its intrinsic goofiness.

With his sun-cracked leather visage and wildcat manner—the solid physical presence, drowsy menace, and spitting fury when riled—Trejo seems born to play Machete, even if the character proves to be little more than a badass Mystery Man. Fahey and the achingly sexy-tough Rodriguez are also highlights, but let’s not perpetuate the misconception that fine acting is the primary draw here. Machete is a film about a guy who kills people with machetes (and Bowie knives, and meat cleavers, and surgical saws…), and the fact that it’s executed with vitality and brazenness doesn’t mitigate its inherently lowbrow nature. Indeed, there’s something invigorating about a film that’s such stupid-fun and also boasts so many cunning flourishes. These include subtle touches like the green-brown bruises on Lohan’s forearms, as well as screamingly obvious metaphors like the crucifix built from closed-circuit security monitors. Perhaps Machete’s most cutting gesture is that every character—including the film’s bigoted villains—is seen wolfing down Tex-Mex cuisine with gusto, suggesting that those who rail against a cross-border incursion are already a tad behind the curve.

The Red Shoes

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

1948 (UK)
Directors: Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger
Viewed: September 5, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Webster University Moore Auditorium)

[The Red Shoes was screened on September 3-5, 2010 as a part of the Webster University Film Series' Dance on Film feature.]

[SPOILERS] “Time rushes by, love rushes by, life rushes by, but the Red Shoes go on.”  Another inexcusable blind spot in my cinema literacy, rectified at long last. Much has been written about the film’s Technicolor glories, and about its surreal central ballet performance. I don’t have much to add at the moment, other than to observe that while technically tame compared to, say, a contemporary show-stopper from Julie Taymor, The Red Shoes‘ ballet represents a far more daring gambit, narratively speaking. It takes a certain creative courage to drop a trippy, fantastical fifteen-minute ballet sequence into a film that is otherwise poised between a bubbling “Life Backstage” melodrama and an archetypal romantic tragedy.

Moira Shearer’s flaming tresses (and perfectly freckled bosom) aside, the most compelling aspect of the film for me is unquestionably Anton Walbrook’s for-the-ages portrayal of Mephistophelean producer Boris Lermontov. He’s a domineering monster at heart, but there’s nonetheless something pitiable in Walbrook’s performance that suggests genuine artistic torment. The ambiguity of what’s going on behind that perfectly collected and groomed façade, the uncertainty about what exactly motivates Lermontov, is what makes him such a delicious character. Walbrook himself was gay, and Powell and Pressburger seem to have conceived of the character as gay, which is fortunate, given that mere sexual craving for Vickie wouldn’t be half as interesting as the hazy gestalt of possessiveness, paternalism, resentment, entitlement, and artistic idealism that seems to animate Lermontov.

One complaint: Setting aside the notorious plot hole on display in the final scenes—Why the heck is Vickie wearing the red shoes before the show even starts?—the post-suicide coda strikes me as largely unnecessary. Much of it feels emotionally leaden or just downright silly, especially after the fiendish crescendo of the dressing room confrontation: Lermontov’s choked-up announcement from the stage, the performance of the ballet sans-lead, and the lingering death scene between Julian and a suspiciously un-mangled Vickie. Far be it from me to re-write a masterpiece, but it would have been more satisfying if the film had concluded shortly after Vickie’s fatal leap.

Barfly

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

1987 (USA)
Director: Barbet Schroeder
Viewed: September 3, 2010
Format: VHS - Warner Brothers (1998)

“No money, no job, no rent. Hey, I’m back to normal.” Barfly is one of those films that’s been languishing without a proper American DVD release, so I had to turn to VHS when I wanted to share it with friends. I had seen the film years ago, but apparently remembered virtually nothing of it, because the screening I caught at this year’s Ebertfest left me gobsmacked and grinning from ear to ear. You don’t have to be a fan of Charles Bukowski to appreciate what he and director Schroeder are doing, which is less about telling a story (there isn’t much of one) than about sketching a portrait of a man, a lifestyle, and most significantly, an ethos. That ethos is personified in Bukowski-analogue Henry Chinaski, portrayed by a paunchy, limp-haired Mickey Rourke, affecting a Snagglepuss cadence that works wonders with every muttered aside. (”Misdirected animosity…”) Between Rourke, whose charisma here is so molten it burns through the dingy sheets and blood-spattered boxer shorts, and riveting a Faye Dunaway in Walking Husk Mode, Barfly is inescapably an actor’s film. Yet there’s plenty to love here formally, whether from the unobtrusive, marvelous movements of Robby Müller’s camera or the way that he and Schroeder convey the distinct scuzziness of Los Angeles’ fleabag apartments and dive bars. You can practically smell the rail scotch and sour armpit funk. In short, it’s a smart, funny, enthralling little film that more people should see.

Cannibal Holocaust

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

1980 (Italy)
Director: Ruggero Deodato
Viewed: August 27, 2010
Format: Theatrical Print (Hi-Pointe Theater)

The legends surrounding Ruggeo Deodato’s exploitation magnum opus are so fulsome and contradictory, I think it’s probably best to simply appraise what is on the screen, and leave questions of sincerity and intentions aside. Revisiting the film following a Halloween DVD screening in 2008—and for the first time theatrically—it’s more self-evident to me that Cannibal Holocaust is a fairly daring slice of nastiness, rather than merely nasty. Granted, it’s gratuitous, skuzzy, and stomach-churning, and in its lowest moments it quite deliberately apes a Mondo feature, lending it the whiff of a spectacle with no purpose other than to revolt. I’m thinking particularly of the on-screen animal murder, which is admittedly gruesome, but also comes off as sort of vapidly shocking and pointless, aspirations of crude metaphor aside. However, what’s fascinating here is how much time Deodato devotes to things that aren’t violent and appalling. Robert Kerman’s anthropologist spends a healthy chunk of the film negotiating with guides, sparring with television executives, and interviewing acquaintances of the murdered documentarians. Not exactly the sort of stuff that keeps squirming teens in their seats when they came for gore and titties. Of course, the film’s innovative found footage / double-timeline structure definitively betrays the filmmaker’s interest in the artificiality of cinema. Errol Morris it ain’t, but that’s sort of the point; if it accomplishes nothing else, Cannibal Holocaust puts to rest the notion that metafilm is necessarily a pretentious, high-brow endeavor.

It’s in the pursuit of its social commentary that the film finds its most gratifying traction, amid all the excessively drawn-out, oddly-scored scenes of turtle gutting and awkward, post-atrocity coitus. Sometimes this commentary has all the subtlety of a jackhammer, as when Deodato repeatedly cuts from the found footage to the executives in the screening room, who shift uncomfortably in their seats and throw horrified glances at one another. (Get it?! You’re culpable too, Mr. and Mrs. Viewer!) Occasionally, however, the film exhibits some genuine black wit. One of my favorite moments occurs when documentary director Alan Yates (Carl Gabriel Yorke), upon stumbling upon an impaled woman, is observed cracking a shit-eating grin. When Yates’ cameraman alerts him that he is being filmed, the director reverts to carefully arranged look of grim sorrow. Now that’s delicious satire! My main problem with Cannibal Holocaust is the old saw about having and eating one’s cake. The film bottoms out on the shoals of tastelessness even as it lobs righteous hand-grenades at filmmakers, journalists, Big Media, and consumers. Of course, the “wants to have it both ways” charge is leveled at almost every work that addresses violence, sex, or other potentially offensive subject matter, but I think the often jarring contrast between Cannibal Holocaust’s leering tendencies and its cleverness supports at least an indictment for two-facedness.