<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Gateway Cinephiles</title>
	<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com</link>
	<description>A casual assemblage of St. Louis film fans and fanatics, dedicated to the appreciation and criticism of classic, independent, cult, and overlooked cinema.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uffish, But Not Frumious by Monday Morning Diary (March 15)</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/#comment-28606</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/#comment-28606</guid>
					<description>[...] Andrew Wyatt has what I feel is a dead-on appraisal of Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland at his ‘Gateway Cinephiles’ home.  It’s a fabulous capsule review:                                             http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Andrew Wyatt has what I feel is a dead-on appraisal of Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland at his ‘Gateway Cinephiles’ home.  It’s a fabulous capsule review:                                             <a href='http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/' rel='nofollow'>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uffish, But Not Frumious by Monday Morning Diary (March 15) &#171; Wonders in the Dark</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/#comment-28603</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/#comment-28603</guid>
					<description>[...] Andrew Wyatt has what I feel is a dead-on appraisal of Tim Burton&amp;#8217;s Alice in Wonderland at his &amp;#8216;Gateway Cinephiles&amp;#8217; home.  It&amp;#8217;s a fabulous capsule review:                                             http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Andrew Wyatt has what I feel is a dead-on appraisal of Tim Burton&#8217;s Alice in Wonderland at his &#8216;Gateway Cinephiles&#8217; home.  It&#8217;s a fabulous capsule review:                                             <a href='http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/' rel='nofollow'>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uffish, But Not Frumious by Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/#comment-28575</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/03/09/uffish-but-not-frumious/#comment-28575</guid>
					<description>&quot;Happily, Alice in Wonderland, while hardly the rich, cerebral adaptation that Carroll’s works deserve, proves to be a solid little adventure tale that traipses through a deliciously gratifying Burton-esque landscape.&quot;

Indeed Andrew.  I am precisely where you are with this film!  No, it's no PEE WEE'S GREAT ADVENTURE, but there's an often splendid and sublime visual design, and another wonderful Danny Elfman score to enjoy.  I did not see it in 3D, but I doubt there would have been a major upgrade in opinion.  There are some creativ eissues here in the rather disjointed narrative flow, but this was no failure at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Happily, Alice in Wonderland, while hardly the rich, cerebral adaptation that Carroll’s works deserve, proves to be a solid little adventure tale that traipses through a deliciously gratifying Burton-esque landscape.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed Andrew.  I am precisely where you are with this film!  No, it&#8217;s no PEE WEE&#8217;S GREAT ADVENTURE, but there&#8217;s an often splendid and sublime visual design, and another wonderful Danny Elfman score to enjoy.  I did not see it in 3D, but I doubt there would have been a major upgrade in opinion.  There are some creativ eissues here in the rather disjointed narrative flow, but this was no failure at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Experimental Treatment by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-28043</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-28043</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the kind words, Castor, and thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, Castor, and thanks for stopping by!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Experimental Treatment by Castor</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-28001</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/22/experimental-treatment/#comment-28001</guid>
					<description>Excellent review! I absolutely loved the movie even though it does sag intermittently thanks to the outstanding performances from a very deep cast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent review! I absolutely loved the movie even though it does sag intermittently thanks to the outstanding performances from a very deep cast.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Film Diary: Wonderful Town by Monday Morning Diary (March 1) &#171; Wonders in the Dark</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/25/film-diary-wonderful-town/#comment-27840</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/25/film-diary-wonderful-town/#comment-27840</guid>
					<description>[...] Andrew Wyatt has a great review up at his place of Wonderful Town: http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/25/film-diary-wonderful-town/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Andrew Wyatt has a great review up at his place of Wonderful Town: <a href='http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/25/film-diary-wonderful-town/' rel='nofollow'>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/25/film-diary-wonderful-town/</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on StLIFF 2009: Day Five by Troy Olson</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2009/11/18/stliff-2009-day-five/#comment-27697</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2009/11/18/stliff-2009-day-five/#comment-27697</guid>
					<description>While I can't argue with your assessment of Jia's film, I don't think it worked for me quite as much as it did for you.  I liked STILL LIFE a lot more and found 24 CITY to be a bit more of a gimmick film with the artifice of actors as &quot;real people.&quot;  (Though I did get a smile out of the Joan Chen as Joan Chen thing...)

But whatever I thought of the narrative of the film I agree with you wholeheartedly in one respect -- Jia's eye for photography is magnificent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I can&#8217;t argue with your assessment of Jia&#8217;s film, I don&#8217;t think it worked for me quite as much as it did for you.  I liked STILL LIFE a lot more and found 24 CITY to be a bit more of a gimmick film with the artifice of actors as &#8220;real people.&#8221;  (Though I did get a smile out of the Joan Chen as Joan Chen thing&#8230;)</p>
<p>But whatever I thought of the narrative of the film I agree with you wholeheartedly in one respect &#8212; Jia&#8217;s eye for photography is magnificent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here at the End of All Things by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2009/12/05/here-at-the-end-of-all-things/#comment-27653</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2009/12/05/here-at-the-end-of-all-things/#comment-27653</guid>
					<description>Brian:

I think it's a safe bet to assume that if you liked the novel, you'll liked the film.  I don't the film is an unqualified success, for the reasons I elucidated in my review, but I would also add that time has made me come around to the notion that this may be the best &quot;faithful&quot; adaptation of McCarthy's novel we could have hoped for: good but not great.  There's a better movie in the novel somewhere, but it would require quite a bit of rejiggering of the source material.  The Coens took No Country For Old Men, a great novel, and turned it into a cinematic masterpiece precisely because they knew exactly where McCarthy's sensibilities and their own overlapped, and where they complemented one another.  Hillcoat isn't doing anything so daring.  His vision of the The Road is just a reverent filmic version of the novel's substantive and emotional core.  Good stuff, just not great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a safe bet to assume that if you liked the novel, you&#8217;ll liked the film.  I don&#8217;t the film is an unqualified success, for the reasons I elucidated in my review, but I would also add that time has made me come around to the notion that this may be the best &#8220;faithful&#8221; adaptation of McCarthy&#8217;s novel we could have hoped for: good but not great.  There&#8217;s a better movie in the novel somewhere, but it would require quite a bit of rejiggering of the source material.  The Coens took No Country For Old Men, a great novel, and turned it into a cinematic masterpiece precisely because they knew exactly where McCarthy&#8217;s sensibilities and their own overlapped, and where they complemented one another.  Hillcoat isn&#8217;t doing anything so daring.  His vision of the The Road is just a reverent filmic version of the novel&#8217;s substantive and emotional core.  Good stuff, just not great.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here at the End of All Things by Brian Jarrett</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2009/12/05/here-at-the-end-of-all-things/#comment-27630</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2009/12/05/here-at-the-end-of-all-things/#comment-27630</guid>
					<description>Great review Andrew.  I read the book but I haven't seen the movie yet.  If this movie can capture 75% of the book's spirit and mood then I'll consider it a success.  I don't particularly envy Hillcoat's challenge in turning this book into film.  The book is just brilliant; making a movie just as brilliant is a tall order.

I'm particularly interested in seeing Mortenson as the Man; he may very well be one of only a handful of actors who could pull off this role.  It's actually one of the reasons I'm so eager to see this film.

I hear it's out on Blu-ray this spring; I'm waiting for it with both trepidation and excitement.  Trepidation because it's just so damn emotionally battering; excitement because this father and son love story is just so damn beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review Andrew.  I read the book but I haven&#8217;t seen the movie yet.  If this movie can capture 75% of the book&#8217;s spirit and mood then I&#8217;ll consider it a success.  I don&#8217;t particularly envy Hillcoat&#8217;s challenge in turning this book into film.  The book is just brilliant; making a movie just as brilliant is a tall order.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m particularly interested in seeing Mortenson as the Man; he may very well be one of only a handful of actors who could pull off this role.  It&#8217;s actually one of the reasons I&#8217;m so eager to see this film.</p>
<p>I hear it&#8217;s out on Blu-ray this spring; I&#8217;m waiting for it with both trepidation and excitement.  Trepidation because it&#8217;s just so damn emotionally battering; excitement because this father and son love story is just so damn beautiful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Film Diary: Black Mama, White Mama by Monday Morning Diary (February 22) &#171; Wonders in the Dark</title>
		<link>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/20/film-diary-black-mama-white-mama/#comment-27502</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/20/film-diary-black-mama-white-mama/#comment-27502</guid>
					<description>[...]  At Gateway Cinephiles, Andrew Wyatt has penned a great review of a DVD release:                                                http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/20/film-diary-black-mama-white-mama/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  At Gateway Cinephiles, Andrew Wyatt has penned a great review of a DVD release:                                                <a href='http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/20/film-diary-black-mama-white-mama/' rel='nofollow'>http://gatewaycinephiles.com/2010/02/20/film-diary-black-mama-white-mama/</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
