Posts Tagged ‘Documentaries’

Into the Abyss

Thursday, December 1st, 2011

2011 (Germany / Canada)
Director: Werner Herzog
Viewed: November 29, 2011
Format: Theatrical Print (Landmark Tivoli Theater)

Into the Abyss might be the closest Werner Herzog will ever come to creating a work of outright agitprop, and yet it’s still light-years from the cinematic polemics of film-makers like Charles Ferguson and Alex Gibney. Herzog’s ambitions are far too multi-faceted and high-minded to indulge in political swipes or straightforward argumentation, even in a film that tackles a topic as contentious as the death penalty in America. At every turn, Into the Abyss proves intriguingly divergent from what one expects from a documentary on a Very Serious Issue, although it is in most respects exactly what one expects from a Werner Herzog documentary.

The entry point for the writer-director’s somber new feature is a shocking and senseless 2001 triple homicide in the Houston suburban-rural fringe community of Conroe, Texas. In separate trials, Jason Burkett and Michael Perry were convicted of committing the murders in the course of a scheme to steal a Camaro, with Burkett being sentenced to life in prison, and Perry to death by lethal injection. In the film, Herzog largely refrains from indulging in his customary lyrical musings, appearing only as the interrogating voice in interviews with Burkett, Perry, and others: family members of victims Sandra Stotler, Adam Stotler, and Jeremy Richardson; law enforcement officials who worked the case; locals who recall encounters with the convicted men; a chaplain and former guard captain from Texas’ Death Row; and Burkett’s advocate-turned-wife, whom he married through the glass in the prison visiting room.

Unlike Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky’s Paradise Lost documentaries about the (now exonerated) West Memphis Three—films that simmered with journalistic agitation and white-hot indignation—Into the Abyss isn’t especially concerned with whether Burkett and Perry actually committed the murders for which they were convicted. Both men maintain that they are not to blame for the brutal triple murder, but both are also weirdly elliptical about what exactly happened, and Herzog doesn’t press them on the matter. The film regards the bloody details of the Conroe slayings not as an end, but a means to a sweeping-yet-intimate rumination on American murder, of both the criminal and state-sanctioned varieties. The tone of Into the Abyss is set in its first interview, wherein the Death Row chaplain—after outlining his solemn duties—describes his encounter with a squirrel on a golf course. The anecdote is sort of absurd, and yet it moves the chaplain to tears as he relates it. In that inimitable Herzog way, the film regards the man’s ache with both vague amusement and deep reverence.

Into the Abyss does not spend its time building a case against the death penalty, despite the director’s declaration early in the film that he finds capital punishment abominable. The film is much more interested in reflecting on death and murder as phenomena, on the way that they reach out with scarlet fingers and touch strange places. This philosophical but human-centered approach allows the film to discover some of the rawest moments in any Herzog film since Little Dieter Needs to Fly. Some of these moments are undeniably potent, as when the former Death Row captain describes his own nervous breakdown following the execution of Carla Faye Tucker in 1998. Other scenes contain a more subjective emotional element: Parents will probably be most sensitive to the confessions of Burkett’s dad, also imprisoned for life, as he tearfully describes his memories of holding his infant son and his realization of his absolute failure as a father.

Such heart-tugging is a far cry from the more cerebral, transcendent cogitations of Encounters at the End of the World and Cave of Forgotten Dreams. As a result, Into the Abyss can’t help but feel a bit facile in comparison. It’s arguably easy to achieve poignancy by pointing a camera at a murder victim’s daughter and asking her to talk about her grief, but, as usual, Herzog’s interview methods—the pregnant pauses, the peculiar questions, the intermittent schoolboy coyness—almost always manage to elicit something unexpected. The film regards moments of searing pain and startling eccentricity with the same awed curiosity.

Into the Abyss seems ordained to invite comparisons to In Cold Blood, but unlike Truman Capote’s celebrated non-fiction novel, it has little to say on the relationship between the two perpetrators. Housed in separate prisons and facing different fates, Burkett and Perry barely acknowledge one another, save for the purposes of shifting blame. In the decade since the murders, Perry has maintained a gawky, adolescent countenance and become a born-again Christian. Personable and polite, he betrays no fear of death, but neither does he exhibit any remorse for his deeds. Nor does Burkett, whom prison life has made thicker and tougher, and who maintains that he will one day be exonerated.

The film reserves it most cockeyed fascination for Burkett’s wife, Melyssa, a glassy-eyed murder groupie who has somehow conceived a child with her husband without ever having been alone in the same room with him. (Herzog, clearly amused, asks about a contraband sperm sample, but gets only a non-denial-denial.) The film regards Melyssa with leery skepticism, but is also beguiled with the idea of life emerging so improbably and even farcically from death. It’s a sentiment embodied even more succinctly in a quintessentially “Herzogian” revelation: When the police attempted to move the impounded Camaro years later, they found that a sapling had grown through the floor and into the car.

Look/Listen: StLIFF 2011 - The Last Mountain

Friday, November 11th, 2011

My latest Festival-related piece at Look/Listen is on Bill Haney’s new documentary feature, The Last Mountain. Check it out.

Look/Listen: The Black Power Mixtape 1967-1975

Saturday, October 29th, 2011

My review of Göran Ollson’s The Black Power Mixtape 1967-1975 is up at Look/Listen. Check it out.

Project Nim

Monday, August 15th, 2011

2011 (UK / USA)
Director: James Marsh
Viewed: August 12, 2011
Format: Theatrical Print (Landmark Theaters Plaza Frontenac Cinema)

Numerous thematic angles present themselves for exploration in the tale of Nim Chimsky, the male chimpanzee who was taught American Sign Language as a part of a contentious Columbia University language experiment in the 1970s-80s. James Marsh’s new documentary feature, Project Nim, emphasizes the colorful characters associated with the experiment, as well as the moral conundrums that swirl around the chimp’s treatment, often to the exclusion of the story’s academic context and ramifications. How the experiment fit into the then-contemporary research landscape of linguistics and cognition is not touched upon. However, the film ably reveals the ad-hoc resourcefulness and suspect ethics that characterized the project’s day-to-day routine. From these details, a picture emerges of a research project which was seemingly blessed with resounding success, despite its disorganization and soapy conflicts. Nim’s signing vocabulary is envisioned as a line that climbs ever upward, representing the remarkable progress of a bevy of teachers, all working under the eye (and thumb) of psychology professor Herbert Terrace. However, Project Nim clearly signals through its stylistic particulars that its aim is not a celebration of the titular chimp’s intellect, but a fairly grim condemnation of the human participants.

Marsh relies upon archival materials and recreations to supplement extensive interviews with the academics and caretakers who interacted with Nim on a regular basis. The director allows his subjects to tell Nim’s story in their own words, but hardly anyone (save the chimpanzee) emerges looking particularly honorable, least of all Terrace, who projects a tweedy sort of exploitative arrogance. This suits the film’s purpose well enough, as Project Nim isn’t striving for a work of explanatory journalism or a profound rumination on language. What Marsh presents is a disconcerting tragedy about humankind’s relationship to a wild animal that it psychologically sculpted for woolly scientific ends. The film’s central criticism of the experiment only becomes evident after the project’s funding evaporates and Nim becomes too large and aggressive for the researchers to handle. The once-renowned ape is then shuttled to a succession of unpleasant confinements and abusive environments, culminating in the horrors of an NYU medical testing facility. It’s all presented for maximum pathos, sometimes manipulatively so, but Marsh is not aiming for anything as prosaic as a work of animal right agitprop. The specificity of the film is the key to its emotional and moral strength. Project Nim poses that the experiment altered Nim’s development, rendering him unfit to abruptly re-enter a caged existence with his fellow chimps. While steering clear of righteous snottiness, Marsh unambiguously presents Nim’s plight as the direct result of unmet human obligations. That Nim was subject to a litany of psychological and physical abuse after he outgrew his usefulness is framed as an unforgivable disgrace, and justly so.

Tabloid

Tuesday, August 9th, 2011

2010 (USA)
Director: Errol Morris
Viewed: August 7, 2011
Format: Theatrical Print (Landmark Theaters Tivoli Theater)

One of the more striking aspects of Errol Morris’ delightfully nutty new documentary, Tabloid, is how closely the film’s thematic concerns track with those of the director’s previous effort, the absorbing and incisive Standard Operating Procedure. The latter film affirmed that what went on behind closed doors at the Abu Ghraib prison was, if anything, stranger than what one might conclude from those notorious photographs of naked prisoners and grinning MPs. However, even at its most bizarre, the Abu Ghraib scandal doesn’t hold a candle to the story of Tabloid, a globetrotting farce that encompasses a beauty queen, Mormon missionaries, unrequited love, kidnapping, a sheepdog, BDSM sex, a vicious British tabloid war, and a South Korean cloning laboratory. Still, the most prominent commonality between the two films isn’t the stranger-than-fiction quality of the events they depict, but how Morris employs those events to explore the slippery nature of truth, and to illustrate how maddening it can be to resolve limited and often contradictory evidence into a coherent narrative. Such matters, of course, have been a perennial fascination of Morris’ since the The Thin Blue Line. (Which, incidentally, has the moral distinction of being a work of cinema that arguably saved a person’s life.)

Tabloid’s concerns, however, are far less grave than a wrongful murder conviction or a shadow program of prisoner torture. In truth, I’m reluctant to summarize Tabloid’s story in greater detail, as one of the central pleasures of the film is the sensation of pure astonishment as Morris reveals each new demented twist. The tale will be familiar to British filmgoers who recall when the Daily Mirror recounted every jot for weeks on end in 1977-1978. However, for the rest of Tabloid’s viewers, the story will be a tawdry roller coaster of peculiar details and flabbergasting revelations. Suffice to say that at the eye of the film’s hurricane sits Joyce McKinney, a figure who is equal parts spellbinding, baffling, and utterly unbearable. Tabloid is, in essence, her story, told in her own words and supplemented (and refuted) with the words of associates, experts, and journalists. One can easily discern what attracted Morris to McKinney as a documentary subject: She combines magnetic charisma, giggly eccentricities, relentless self-absorption, and a disconcerting lack of remorse. Frankly, she seems barking mad, and yet adept at cloaking herself in romantic idealism and folksy turns of phrase. Ultimately, the film can’t help but convey a glimmer of sympathy for McKinney in light of the press’ remorseless (and disproportionate) trampling of her life, even when her tears are very likely of the crocodile variety.

Morris’ method is well-established at this point, although Tabloid presents some slight variations on that method. The bulk of the film consists of talking-head interviews filmed with the director’s signature “Interrotron,” which allows the subject to look directly into the camera in a naturalistic, conversational manner. The director intersperses this interview footage with archival materials, brisk special effects, pithy sound cues, and ironic bits of stock footage. Unlike some of Morris’ features, Tabloid abstains from stylized recreations. Instead, the film utilizes droll animated sequences based on the graphical style of the British tabloids, and even employs actual clippings as animation elements. This suits Tabloid’s tone of bewildered amusement, and lends it the kind of distinctive formal flourish that documentaries about sensational crimes rarely boast. As in The Fog of War and Standard Operating Procedure, Morris’ presence is limited to the odd, off-screen question, usually delivered in an incredulous tone. This neatly encapsulates the first-order appeal of Tabloid—the allure of that which seems beyond belief—and also the particular brilliance of the filmmaker’s approach. Morris’ estimable ability to coax profound themes from oddball portraits and scathing exposés alike would not be half as effective, were he not so self-evidently intrigued on a personal level by the stories he tells.

Look/Listen - Beats, Rhymes & Life

Friday, August 5th, 2011

My review of Michael Rapaport’s Beats, Rhymes & Life: The Travels of A Tribe Called Quest is up at Look / Listen. Check it out.

Inside Job

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

2010 (USA)
Director: Charles Ferguson
Viewed: July 11, 2011
Format: DVD - Sony (2011)

Charles Ferguson’s riveting No End in Sight is an excellent example of how a composed and agile presentation of facts can produce a tremendously potent documentary exposé, without resorting to stunts, gags, or clumsy emotional appeals.  It also happens to be one of the best films made to date about the Iraq War.  (Perhaps even the best, depending on whether one counts Standard Operating Procedure or In the Loop. ) Ferguson’s debut feature demonstrated that he had the aptitude to convey a sprawling real-life tale with clarity, gravity, and discipline, and in doing so elevated him a notch above more renowned and gimmicky purveyors of agitprop such as Alex Gibney, Michael Moore, and Davis Guggenheim.

It’s therefore gratifying to see Ferguson’s talents brought to bear on the most critical public affairs story of the past decade, the ongoing Great Recession. It’s a challenging tale to tackle, partly due to the intrinsic complexity of the subject matter, and partly due to the intense politicization of its elements. As a result, even the broad outlines of the recession have never been very effectively communicated in the mainstream press. Granted, NPR’s This American Life won a Peabody award in 2008 with their impressive piece on the housing crisis, “The Giant Pool of Money,” but the scope of Inside Job is much broader, stretching all the way back to the sweeping financial deregulation of the Reagan years and concluding with a finger pointed square at the Wall Street cronyism of the Obama administration.

The style of Ferguson’s sophomore effort is similar to that of No End in Sight. The director interviews prominent figures from the financial industry, government, academia, and the media, piecing together their testimony to construct a narrative about the financial crisis’ origins, structure, and effects.  Some of these interviewees are friendly to Ferguson’s sublimated anger, and essentially become his proxies for a scathing rebuke of those alleged Masters of the Universe who heedlessly ushered in a global economic meltdown.  Ferguson also speaks with think-tank apologists for Wall Street malfeasance and a few of the perpetrators themselves, who betray not an iota of remorse, bristling at the suggestion that anyone is to blame for our current predicament.

The director intersperses these talking heads with gorgeous but anonymous photography of soaring skyscrapers and deserted subdivisions, and copious visual effects that present head-spinning financial topics with striking lucidity. Viewers still hazy about collateralized debt obligations or credit default swaps will find no clearer or more concise explanation of the role such dodgy financial products played in sinking the world’s economy.

Inside Job is an admittedly handsome documentary, but ultimately one whose formal cinematic attributes are less significant than the facts that the film seeks to convey. There is little information in the film that is new, but it is indispensable to have that information presented in one slick package. The film is therefore less a work of art than an essential piece of top-notch explanatory journalism, the cinematic equivalent of a long-form work of reporting for a glossy magazine. In condensing a confounding subject with such vigor and livid focus, Ferguson reaffirms his status as America’s grim professor of calamity.

Look/Listen: Circo

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

My review of Aaron Schock’s Circo is up at Look/Listen. Check it out.

Cave of Forgotten Dreams

Friday, May 13th, 2011

2010 (USA)
Director: Werner Herzog
Viewed: May 11, 2011
Format: 3D Digital Projection (Hi-Pointe Theater)

A feature documentary about the 32,000-year-old paintings within Chauvet Cave near Vallon-Pont-d’Arc, France is almost guaranteed to contain abundant gawking at the archaeological wonders on display, as well as wooly speculation on the site’s lingering scientific mysteries. A Werner Herzog documentary about the same topic also promises genuine cinema, as well as a slightly askew consideration of the profound thematic concerns that the director typically espies in any protracted consideration of the natural (or human-made) world.

In this respect, Cave of Forgotten Dreams delivers exquisitely. Granted, when the subject is the oldest cave paintings on Earth, the purple philosophical musings practically write themselves. Heck, the themes are all standing around in plain sight: the essence of human nature, the function of artistic representation, and the relative opacity or porosity of time and space. Still, there’s something gratifying in allowing Herzog’s delicious German cadences to guide us through Chauvet’s wonders, although his characteristically loopy interjections and ruminations are, as usual, a matter of taste. (Referring to the hundreds of thousand of spatial data points used to map the cave, Herzog queries a geologist, “Do they dream?”)

It’s admittedly remarkable how much detail one can discern from the HD digital footage of the cave’s pristine, phantasmagorical spaces, especially given the severe constraints placed on the crew in terms of equipment and access. Herzog’s discipline as a documentarian and the 3D element both reveal their merits in the film’s long, glacial pans of the paintings, set to Ernst Reijseger’s evocative original score. For great lengths of the film, the viewer is simply invited to gaze on the paintings and dwell on their meaning: for the Paleolithic artist, for themselves, and for the human race as a whole. The 3D photography superbly captures the complex curvature of the rock faces, conveying the astonishing manner in which the artists utilized the spatial nature of their medium to create depth, motion, and narrative. While the new film doesn’t attain the intellectual sophistication or provocations of his late masterpieces Grizzly Man or Encounters at the End of the World, this film still exhibits Herzog the documentarian at the top of his game.

Look/Listen: Sound It Out

Thursday, April 21st, 2011

My review of Jeanie Finlay’s Sound It Out is up at Look/Listen. Check it out.